The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5973 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 330 disagreed to.
Amendment 331 moved—[Douglas Lumsden].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I call amendment 50, in the name of—[Interruption.]
Hold on. We will pause. There is nothing like the convener confusing himself. I apologise to those present.
I call amendment 344, in the name of Douglas Lumsden, already debated with amendment 11.
Amendment 344 not moved.
Amendment 51 moved—[Tim Eagle].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 51 disagreed to.
Amendment 52 not moved.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I remind members that amendments 21 and 315 are direct alternatives, which means that they can be moved and decided on. The text of whichever is last agreed to is what will appear in the bill.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I had not got there yet. [Laughter.] Sorry—that slight pause was just to catch you out, Ms Grant.
I call amendment 340, in the name of Rhoda Grant, which has already been debated with amendment 10.
Amendment 340 moved—[Rhoda Grant].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 397 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 397 disagreed to.