The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5973 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you. I am looking around to see whether any other members wish to speak. As none do, I will make a couple of points.
I agree with amendment 27, which relates to the outdoor access code and deer management. The outdoor access code was introduced as a result of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 and published in 2005. To date, 20 years on, it has never been updated; it is probably the only code that I know that has lasted that long without any change. The problem with the outdoor access code is that it stands as it stands. When I have approached ministers to see whether it could be reformed, I was told, “No. It is a matter of fact and there will be no changes.” On the basis that it is a matter of fact and cannot be changed, I do not see why it needs to be included in the bill. The outdoor access code stands as it is, so complying with it is a matter of law, not a matter of debate in a management plan.
In my experience, deer management plans cover large areas of land. I drew up a few in my previous existence as a land manager. There might be deer management for a holding that is surrounded by land for which there is a different policy. For example, Forestry and Land Scotland has a zero-tolerance policy on deer and will shoot every single deer that it sees on its land on the basis that it is trying to control them. That means that, whatever the person who is surrounded by such land does, it will have absolutely zero effect. Of course, it might have an effect on larger landholdings where deer management plans are appropriate, but I suggest that a deer management plan that is not supported as part of an area deer management plan is absolutely without value. I would be grateful to hear what the cabinet secretary has to say on that and about her experience of larger-scale deer management plans.
As far as amendment 25 on the sale of land is concerned, it is my experience that not many people plan sales in the future. Usually, a tragic event happens, such as a death in the family, a disaster, a divorce or any other thing that causes land to be sold and split up. Trying to predict a future sale is pretty impossible.
It is possible to predict a sale when corporate landowners have a land management plan for a certain amount of land and wish to turn it over every certain number of years. For example, as has been previously discussed, Forestry and Land Scotland develops forests, works out that the forests are planted and then is prepared to sell the land on so that it can develop further forests. In most cases, however, sale is not predicted at the outset of land management. I certainly would not be in a position to say when I was going to sell my smallholding, because I hope that I never will. I cannot see why the Government should ask me to include that information in a land management plan.
I look forward to the cabinet secretary telling me in her summary, which she is coming to now, why those reasons should be ignored.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 341 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 34 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 6, Against 0, Abstentions 1.
Amendment 34 agreed to.
Amendment 36 moved—[Mairi Gougeon].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 419 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 422 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Against
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Against
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Abstentions
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)