Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 7218 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

United Kingdom Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 1 March 2023

Edward Mountain

With regard to the Sea Fisheries (Amendment) Regulations 2023, my concern relates to more bass being seen around the coast of Scotland as a result of the warming of the seas. They are caught regularly—they have been caught right up as far as Tongue. The Scottish Government and the UK Government propose that no more than two sea bass may be retained per fisherman per day during the open season, which runs from March to December. How will they police that?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

United Kingdom Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 1 March 2023

Edward Mountain

It seems strange to bring in a law if it cannot be enforced. Signing up to something that is unenforceable could bring discredit to the Government. I would be grateful if the committee would agree to seek guidance on that.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Future Agriculture Policy

Meeting date: 1 March 2023

Edward Mountain

Although I have attended the committee and made a declaration of my interests before, considering the subject that we will discuss today, I want to make a slightly more detailed declaration of my interests so that there is no dubiety about my interest in the subject.

I am a member of a family farming partnership that employs three people full time. I have been farming in my own right for more than 40 years. I run a pedigree Simmental beef herd. I grow barley and vegetables. I farm not only land that I own, but also land that I am a tenant of. To save any dubiety, I note that I receive agricultural subsidies under the current schemes—the single farm payment scheme, the less favoured area support scheme and the beef calf scheme.

Thank you, convener. I thought that it was worth putting that on the record at the start.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Future Agriculture Policy

Meeting date: 1 March 2023

Edward Mountain

Okay. Thank you, that is helpful. You and many other farmers across Scotland have used genetic breeding—line breeding—to increase the productivity of your animals, which means that farmers can get them to slaughter more quickly. The sadness is that beef cattle that are ready at 11 months cannot be sold because they are too young—they have to wait for another month before they can go into the food chain. That must be a mistake if we are trying to speed up production. Do you agree? A yes or no from Jim Walker on that would be helpful.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Future Agriculture Policy

Meeting date: 1 March 2023

Edward Mountain

Jim Walker, perhaps you could dwell on that answer and think about the fact that we are talking not just about carbon. If a farmer gets X amount per acre they will be paid only Y for their output. I am sure that you have views on that.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Future Agriculture Policy

Meeting date: 1 March 2023

Edward Mountain

I want to follow that through. Surely it is a mixture. One side of the issue is improving the efficiency of the animals. If there are cattle, it is a matter of reducing the calving interval and the time that it takes to get the animal into the food chain, and therefore having fewer animals around.

I cannot follow your logic if you are saying that grassland that gets to a stage of being carbon neutral should be used for something else. If grassland is properly looked after, it does not become carbon neutral; it becomes able to produce and sequester carbon from the atmosphere through the use of animals that put manure back on to the ground. I do not see the circularity of your argument. It seems to be far too segmented. Perhaps you can convince me that I am wrong.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Future Agriculture Policy

Meeting date: 1 March 2023

Edward Mountain

The question will be brief, but the answers may not be. I cannot account for those.

I share the sentiments that have been expressed. We do not want to have a complicated system of forms to fill out. That is not good for farmers or for agents. We do not want to move to a system that encourages the secondary users of our products to benefit by driving prices down for producers—the farmers.

My question is twofold. How do we stop those who use our products siphoning off funds that are meant to improve habitats and environments on farms? Do you think that the Government has left enough time to model the outcomes of what it is suggesting? What the Government did in 2015 did not achieve the stated aims. I put those questions to Andrew Moir and then to Jim Walker.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services Inquiry

Meeting date: 28 February 2023

Edward Mountain

I am confused by your answer. In that report, the Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee said that it was a “cluttered decision-making” process that “lacks transparency”; that there had been “varying degrees of failure”; that CMAL and the Scottish Government

“failed to discharge their respective responsibilities ... effectively”;

and that the experience of the contracts for 801 and 802 “exposed serious failures” in the tripartite arrangement, which therefore needs

“a root and branch overhaul”.

Basically, the REC Committee said that CMAL failed but, on the way forward, you are saying, “It’s fine. There’s not a problem. Let’s just crack on.” Is that what you are saying? If it is, I am seriously concerned for ferry procurement in Scotland.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services Inquiry

Meeting date: 28 February 2023

Edward Mountain

Do you challenge it only on the basis that you are making creeping changes?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services Inquiry

Meeting date: 28 February 2023

Edward Mountain

Okay. I will come back to that.