The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7218 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Jackie, I am not sure whether you want to ask a follow-up question on that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
On behalf of the committee, I can say that, if you write to us on that subject, members can decide whether they want to take it further. It would be helpful to be able to understand the issue better, once you have had a chance to reflect on all things Caledonian sleeper.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
The next questions are from me, cabinet secretary, on what appears to have become my chosen subject: ferries.
Last week, we heard that there had been a reprofiling of the loans to Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd. I am concerned about that, and I would be grateful if you could clarify something. Seven loch-class ferries are due to be replaced. Does that mean that the contracts that were to be awarded in this financial year will not be awarded, on the basis that you must have worked out that a percentage of the money is due on signing them? Can you clarify that all seven contracts for those ferries, if they are ready to be signed this year, will be signed? It is a yes-or-no question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Now you have totally confused me, Alison. We have been told that the value of the ferries is about £70 million, and the cost so far attributed to each of them is about £170 million. Are you getting £100 million back from Ferguson Marine on both ferries?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Last week, Mr Gray was a bit iffy, I would suggest, about where it would come from. Anyway, I can quote you to him that it is coming out of his budget.
I turn to the capital budget for ports. My question is about Ardrossan harbour, which is obviously a problem area because the pier is partially collapsed. If Glen Sannox and 802 are to be able to use the harbour, it will need a liquefied natural gas tank and an extension of the quay because it is too short. Is that all in the budget and will it all be done this year, before Glen Sannox comes into service?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
As we found out with the 400kV electricity line that went through it, there will be pressure in relation to the national park.
You mentioned the importance of sharing risk. On the AWPR and the Dalraddy to Kincraig sections of the A9 that I saw being built in the previous session of Parliament, there was huge risk to contractors, so many—as we know—dropped out and would not take part in the construction. Will the first test of whether the industry believes that Transport Scotland is really sharing the risk be when the first problem comes up on the A9 and there is a massive increase in cost, which is bound to happen on some sections?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Convener, may I ask a final brief question?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
It would be brilliant. [Laughter.]
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Yes, it is from the Edward committee. I have no land next to the A9.
Grahame, I want to go back to the comment that you made about statutory processes. There were issues with the Aberdeen western peripheral route. No prior work was done relating to some of the infrastructure adjacent to it and we had huge delays because gas pipelines and electricity lines were discovered.
I was a surveyor for 15 years, so I know that the compulsory purchase process is fairly straightforward. On the A9, the process is probably the easiest one in the world to do, because there are not many landowners along it until Dunkeld. Why is the statutory process holding up the project, despite there being few landowners and infrastructure assets running along the edge of the A9 that could be affected?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Looking at those schemes, I can see that the Dalraddy to Kincraig section, which may have opened on budget, was certainly not on time. It was opened on the right day and then closed for another three months. In addition, the contractor on the AWPR said that it ended up losing money because there were extra costs. Do you think that that put contractors off looking at the A9 again until you came up with this new contract?