Mr Lumsden, with the situation as it is, you have probably made your point that that is not going to happen within a certain timeframe. The cabinet secretary has not said whether she accepts that point, but she has said that, once the restrictions are lifted, she will get back to us about the issue. I think that you will have to do that, cabinet secretary, because there is an issue there. I am happy to leave it at that, if you are happy to leave it at that, Mr Lumsden.

It will have to be really quick. We will have to go to short quick-fire questions and answers.

Cabinet secretary, before you get tempted to set off on an electioneering route, I am sure that you will answer that question in line with the fact that the scheme is set to end by 29 September. You will have to do some work, but I caution you slightly on that.

The cabinet secretary has made it quite clear that such legislation can be introduced, and that it should be done quickly. Given that it would have to be introduced and agreed to before November, will the cabinet secretary undertake to ensure that there will be sufficient time for not only the committee but the people of Scotland to consider the information contained in it?

Thank you, convener. At the outset, I highlight that Caithness Health Action Team strives hard to ensure that healthcare is delivered across the Highlands, but particularly in Caithness, from where it is more difficult for people to get to Raigmore and the centralised health service that is currently run by NHS Highland. There is no doubt that, up there, people feel isolated from that healthcare, as it can take at least an hour and a half under blue light, and probably two and a half hours under normal driving conditions, to get to it.

I remind the committee that, in 2023, extra money was given by the Scottish Government, and NHS Highland chose to use it for closed-loop therapy mainly for adults. Some money went to paediatric services, but there was a concentration on adults and, consequently, some children missed out. As the petitioner has made clear, there are approximately 25 children across the Highlands waiting for a diabetic insulin pump. My estimate of the cost of the pumps alone is about £75,000, which is not a huge amount of money, although there are some ancillary costs involved, as the convener has made clear: the costs are not only from the equipment but from the staff.

Providing the pumps would make a huge, huge difference to children as they come to terms with the diabetes that they must face, sometimes not fully understanding its effects. It would not require much additional money to ensure that all the children in the Highlands have insulin pumps. In fact, it would come at less than the cost of some of the administrative directors who sit on the board of NHS Highland. I therefore think that the committee could encourage NHS Highland to explain where the funding—the extra money that was given to the Government—went originally, why children were not made a priority and whether there are additional funds, with a mere £75,000 needed to provide pumps for all the children.

I will leave it to the committee, but I will just end by saying that it is difficult to overstate how remote people in the Highlands sometimes feel to healthcare, which is centralised. Giving people the ability to manage their own treatment would be truly revolutionary.

Just to start off with, when we questioned Alex Salmond on 8 May, he gave a very clear description of how the Cabinet worked. He said that the “big discussion” at the Cabinet was always the infrastructure plan, and that he would have known if anyone was dragging their feet. He picked me up for suggesting that Alex Neil could be dragging his feet, and said that that could not have happened, and that a minister would have come to him if there was a problem with the delay. Is that how your Cabinet worked as well?

With respect, the funding is critically important—I fully accept that—but what I have laid out to you is a timescale that a surveyor and people working within the industry would set to deliver the project, which I think, from the moment you issue the first order, would be approximately nine years. That is why I am confused that the issue only came to light in 2023, when it probably should have come to light back in 2017. Did Mr Yousaf, who was the transport minister in 2017-18, come to you and tell you that there was a problem then? If he did not, we have probably found out where the delay started from.

I would be careful where you go with that, Ms Sturgeon.

Putting that to one side—

This will be my final question. I do not doubt your determination to deliver the target, but clearly it was infeasible by 2017-18, even under the figures that you have given. Surely that would have been the time to tell people across the Highlands that it was not going to be delivered. I think that there will be very few people in the Highlands who, since then, have not seen or do not know somebody killed as a result of the road. I think that we—or, I should say, you—have been dishonest in that the target was not deliverable by the date that your Government promised on 6 December 2011.