The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 8181 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Edward Mountain
I want to drill down into something that Sam Martin said. You said that sea lice do not kill fish, but 15 minutes later you said that if they are not treated sea lice allow in other diseases that could kill the fish. It is a bit like saying stage 1 cancer does not kill you, but the follow-on cancers will. Is that not right? Sea lice do kill fish.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Edward Mountain
On that basis, that would be right. When salmon farmers put out juvenile fish they treat them before they do so because they are particularly susceptible to disease when they move out, including being susceptible to sea lice, because their skin is particularly thin and liable to be affected by them. Is that not right?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Edward Mountain
I am sorry, convener—can I follow up on that particular matter?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Edward Mountain
If you are going to give us data in six months’ time, you might have some thoughts on how things are progressing at the moment. Is AMR of concern?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Edward Mountain
I would love to see it, if you could send it to me.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Edward Mountain
I thank Graham Simpson for securing the debate. I was disappointed when reading the SNP amendment, which says that the Government is perfect and has everything under control. From the evidence taken on the A9 dualling project by the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee, whose meetings I have had the privilege of attending, it is clear that that is not the case.
In fact, it was clear that Alex Salmond was committed to dualling the roads between our key cities, but that commitment seemed to drop by the wayside when a member of his Cabinet—who, at some stages, did not even recognise that she was in the same Cabinet as him—became First Minister. In 2017, it became clear to the then First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, that the A9 dualling could not be delivered by 2025. The honest thing to do would have been to come forward and tell the people of the Highlands that, but that is not what happened. Disingenuous and dishonest statements were made that the Government was continuing to push forward, but the project was never going to be completed by then—it was not possible.
I do not want to steal Murdo Fraser’s thunder on the A9, because I know that he will want to speak long and hard about it, but I would say that the people of the Highlands were hornswoggled by this Government. It is a great description, and it is a good word because it covers a lot of the words that I could not possibly use in the chamber.
The A96 was supposed to be dualled in 2011—the infrastructure plan said that that would happen. In 2016, updated plans were put forward, which I remember going out to consultation when I was first elected. We were all excited that, finally, the A96 was going to be dualled. Then, in 2017, all the ground surveys had been completed. There was nothing in the way. Those ground surveys cost more than £1 million a mile just from Inverness to Nairn—a huge amount of money. It was all going to happen and, in 2018, when the local inquiry met and we got the results of that, we thought that we were there—home and dry.
However, we are not home and dry—the A96 is not going to be dualled. In fact, only a short section is going to be dualled—the Nairn bypass. What disappoints me is that, when the cabinet secretary turned up at the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee yesterday and was pressed on whether she would meet the deadline of 2030, she was unable to say that she would. I think that she was even unable to say that when she went to Nairn on Saturday, where I hear that the reception was less than favourable. She tells us that the made road orders are made, but nothing is actually happening.
I see Mr Ewing rising to his feet. It is always a pleasure to welcome him to speak favourably in one of our debates.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Edward Mountain
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. My app would not connect. I would have voted no.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Edward Mountain
Mr Ewing and I share constituents, and I totally agree with him. It is a fairly reasonable ask and I cannot believe that the Government is not going to commit to that.
As for the rest of the A96, we seem to be waiting on the results of a review—a review that we were told would be transparent and evidence based, which the Greens had demanded to see whether the road is what the people in the Highlands want. I can tell members that we do not need a review to know that we need the road and we need it now.
I could go on, but that would stretch my time. I will just say that, when it comes to roads in Caithness, the Caithness roads recovery crew has made it quite clear that people would be better off in a tractor than a car and that shake, rattle and roll is not a dance any more; it is what people do getting into the high street. I will leave it there, because we have lots more speakers to hear from.
15:52Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Edward Mountain
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I am having trouble with my phone and could not connect. I would have voted no.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Edward Mountain
I am sorry, Kerry, but we are very short of time—