The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4955 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Edward Mountain
Is the compliance director the same person who has run through the whole project or did the compliance director change when the issue went to the MCA?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Edward Mountain
I understand that and I understand that revisions 4 and 5 were done in November last year. However, revisions 7, 8 and 9, which I suspect are the ones that you are talking about at the moment, were submitted only in July this year. We have had a letter from the MCA, which is clear that, exactly as you have just said, it is not up to it to design out the problem; it is for you to work with it. The letter goes on to say that the regulations that it is referring to have been extant and in force since 2009. It says that there were amendments but that they made no difference. Therefore, the MCA is unclear why you are citing this as a problem—it says that it has been fully consistent on the requirements since 2009.
There seems to be a discrepancy. The MCA says that it is your fault, and you say that it is the MCA’s fault because it is interpreting in a different way. You cannot both be right; one of you has to be wrong.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Edward Mountain
Andrew Miller, you are aware of all these delays. From the board’s point of view, are you comfortable that assumptions were made that proved not to be valid at the end of the day?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Edward Mountain
You are saying that they are hands-on.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Edward Mountain
Wow. If there are no other questions, I thank you very much for coming and giving your evidence this morning. I will briefly suspend the meeting to allow you to depart and for the committee to take a break.
10:39 Meeting suspended.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Edward Mountain
I am unclear why, 10 months after the yard was nationalised and we had a turnaround director in the yard, nothing was turned around and it got worse. Can you explain that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Edward Mountain
So it will meet the original contract.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Edward Mountain
I hope that they are all numbered correctly. Passenger cabins were also dictated on the original specification, but they were never built.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Edward Mountain
What concerns me is that the MCA letter clearly says that
“there has been no reassessment”
of the application of the regulations. They have not changed. You are saying that they have changed, and the MCA is saying they have not, so it is your word against the MCA’s.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Edward Mountain
Yes, it is a fairly damning letter.
Does anyone want to come in on the MCA letter before I ask a slightly different question?