The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6466 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Edward Mountain
That goes back to what I was always told at school: show your workings, and you might get some marks for that.
We move to questions from Bob Doris—over to you, Bob.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Before we have a brief pause to allow people to stretch their legs ahead of the second round of questioning, I will ask a final question. It sounds as though Clare Wharmby, Graeme Roy and, to a certain extent, Richard Dixon are suggesting that we need some early warning indicators to let us know whether we are not achieving targets. Richard, you mentioned transport, which is one of our biggest emitters, and suggested that we know some of the things that are happening, such as developments around concessionary fares and electric vehicles. Should the plan include early warning systems that say that, if we do not achieve a certain thing, we need to pay more attention? Is that what you are suggesting? I do not want to put words in your mouth.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Edward Mountain
So, it is all about buy-in.
On that note, I suspend the meeting. We will reconvene at 11.10.
11:03 Meeting suspended.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 0, Abstentions 2. The proposal is agreed to.
12:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Is the committee happy for some of the questions that I have raised regarding calibres, financial matters and alternatives to be put to the Scottish Government so that we can get a response?
Bob, I see that you want to come back in on that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Edward Mountain
My answer would be that I would let the clerks draft the letter, and I would be very happy to share the draft with Michael Matheson once I am happy with it. In accordance with the way in which I generally respond to these things, I will do so without fear or favour to myself and ensure that we have got it right.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Good morning, and welcome to the 35th meeting in 2025 of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee. Our first item of business is a decision on taking agenda items 4, 5 and 6 in private. Item 4 is consideration of evidence on the draft climate change plan; item 5 is consideration of a draft letter to the Scottish Government on pre-budget scrutiny; and item 6 is consideration of our work programme. Do we agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Edward Mountain
I should have said right at the beginning of the meeting that we have received apologies from Mark Ruskell, who is unable to attend today.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Edward Mountain
I would like to clarify something, as the issues that you have raised are pretty fundamental to the situation that we find ourselves in. Three other committees have agreed to undertake specific bits of work to support the work that we are doing. However, as you said, we have limited time, as the Parliament has to have finished its consultation by 5 March, which means that it is likely that we will be considering our report before we have seen the summary of responses to the Government’s consultation, given that that is likely to be released in early February. On behalf of the committee, I have made our concerns clear in that regard.
Unless I have got my maths entirely wrong—which is quite likely considering my inability to do maths properly, as my mother would say—we will have about nine sitting days after we submit our response in which we can consider the draft plan, which will have been amended to become the final plan. We are exactly where you said we were going to be. To me, that is of huge concern. I am sure that scrutiny will suffer because of the tight timescale.
I just wanted to clarify that work is being done by other committees, and that we remain concerned about the situation.
Sorry for interrupting you—or had you come to a logical end?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Edward Mountain
That is absolutely right and fair. The point you have made about small-calibre bullets relates to such small calibres as .22, where there is no alternative. I think that most people would accept that .243 becoming, or remaining, a suitable calibre for red deer is questionable. You would have to go up to a .270, probably with a 95 to 100-grain bullet as a minimum, because a .243 would not have the effective knock-down capacity.
I certainly take your point, Bob. I do have experience of actually doing this, and I am just trying to get that on the record.