The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6747 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Abstentions
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 1, Against 6, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 25 disagreed to.
Amendment 26 not moved.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
Mark, because the cabinet secretary nodded and that cannot be put in the Official Report, will you ask her how much you were actually asking for, or what you were asking for, and which she was agreeing to?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
I ask Mark Ruskell to speak to amendment 19 and other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
It looks as though that will be discussed later, Mr Harvie.
I invite Mark Ruskell to speak to amendment 18 and other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
Welcome back. We continue our stage 2 consideration of the Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Bill. Amendment 17, in the name of Patrick Harvie, is grouped with amendments 18, 21 and 56.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
I wonder how, if the Parliament does not have a chance to scrutinise whether there is sufficient money available, we are ever going to reach the targets. Surely money will drive whether we can reach the targets. Is that what you are driving at? If it is, I wonder how the Government will look at that. I am interested in your views.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
Douglas Lumsden has some questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Edward Mountain
Before I go to the minister, I would like to make a couple of comments. I started off this morning probably in the same position as Monica, not sure that a motion to annul would be the correct way forward. I have listened to the comprehensive evidence that we have taken this morning, which is quite interesting. I lived and breathed as convener of the REC Committee through the passage of the Transport (Scotland) Bill in 2019. I could probably quote some of the amendments and I saw where some of the issues were. The issue that we are discussing today was never flagged up then—it is not something that we saw—and the committee and the Parliament subsequently supported the franchising system.
Today’s meeting has demonstrated the Parliament when it is at its best, which is when we are doing something called post-legislative scrutiny. We are looking at something and saying to ourselves, “We’re not sure about this. We’re not sure if this is the right decision.” That is where we are at. Just because somebody is doing something elsewhere, following them and doing it in Scotland is not necessarily the right way to go.
I am not convinced by any of the arguments today that a motion to annul would delay the franchising system. In fact, I think that it will strengthen it. I think that it will make it better because everyone will buy into it and support it.
I do not want to put words into your mouth, minister, but you said that you were acutely aware of the feelings of the committee and that you would consider them afterwards. However, it will be up to the Cabinet, as a Cabinet Government, to decide whether changes can be made if the statutory instrument goes through. There is no guarantee to the committee that changes will be made if we allow it to go through. Things change—politics change—and therefore we cannot be sure of that.
For those reasons, and because I have very large concerns that what we are doing might not be the right way to go, I will support those members who said that passing a motion to annul is the right thing to do. I put on record that it is a testament to this committee that the process of post-legislative scrutiny of the Transport (Scotland) Act 2019, which is effectively what we have done, has been effective.
I now pass to the minister before I ask Mr Lumsden to sum up.