The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4955 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
I know that two more members want to ask questions. Because Graham Simpson was so—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Although Graham was so concise in his questions, we have still run out of time, so I will ask the two members concerned if we could submit those questions to the cabinet secretary in writing. I am afraid that we are now out of time for this evidence session.
I thank you and your officials, cabinet secretary. I think you have been here for nearly three hours of questioning—it has been quite a long session. Thank you for being here.
That concludes the public part of our meeting.
12:20 Meeting continued in private until 12:29.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
As we found out with the 400kV electricity line that went through it, there will be pressure in relation to the national park.
You mentioned the importance of sharing risk. On the AWPR and the Dalraddy to Kincraig sections of the A9 that I saw being built in the previous session of Parliament, there was huge risk to contractors, so many—as we know—dropped out and would not take part in the construction. Will the first test of whether the industry believes that Transport Scotland is really sharing the risk be when the first problem comes up on the A9 and there is a massive increase in cost, which is bound to happen on some sections?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Convener, may I ask a final brief question?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
It would be brilliant. [Laughter.]
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Yes, it is from the Edward committee. I have no land next to the A9.
Grahame, I want to go back to the comment that you made about statutory processes. There were issues with the Aberdeen western peripheral route. No prior work was done relating to some of the infrastructure adjacent to it and we had huge delays because gas pipelines and electricity lines were discovered.
I was a surveyor for 15 years, so I know that the compulsory purchase process is fairly straightforward. On the A9, the process is probably the easiest one in the world to do, because there are not many landowners along it until Dunkeld. Why is the statutory process holding up the project, despite there being few landowners and infrastructure assets running along the edge of the A9 that could be affected?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Looking at those schemes, I can see that the Dalraddy to Kincraig section, which may have opened on budget, was certainly not on time. It was opened on the right day and then closed for another three months. In addition, the contractor on the AWPR said that it ended up losing money because there were extra costs. Do you think that that put contractors off looking at the A9 again until you came up with this new contract?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Earlier, Roy made a comment about there being 300 landowners; that is over 80 miles of road on the A9. It is probably every compulsory purchase practitioner’s dream that there are so few, because that makes it relatively simple.
I will turn to the future, because I want to push on something that the convener mentioned, if I may. Alison Irvine, you suggested having a David Climie equivalent for the A9 work. The A9 project will cost £3.7 billion, according to Government figures. It could well increase—the cost is based on 2023 figures—by the time that it is finished in 2024. That is probably going to be closer to £4.5 billion. Are you going to have an overall supremo, making sure that all of that project works and that we get it done? I would say that, with its current staff, that is clearly outwith Transport Scotland’s ability.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
In relation to that point, are the capacity issues that you have just identified the major consideration in delivery of the project by 2035, or do you believe that, notwithstanding those capacity issues, 2035 ought to be an achievable date?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Grahame Barn mentioned spawning, which relates to salmon. The A9 is next to the bottom part of the River Spey, and I have a wild salmon fishery on the river, so I have an interest in relation to salmon that is not particularly relevant, but I wanted to make that clear.