The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4955 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 February 2024
Edward Mountain
I have listened to the evidence that the committee has taken, and I think that Karen Adam’s comments during our evidence taking were apposite in a lot of ways. However—let me be clear—the use of cable restraints and snaring is highly regulated in legislation, and it requires a great deal of formal training. That training has taken us away from where we were many years ago, when I was younger and there were no restrictions on where you could place snares. In those days, you could place them where animals could get hung up and where they could end up—inadvertently, in most cases—strangling themselves to death.
That is not where we are now. Now, snares are set in locations where that cannot happen; they hold the animal in place, and, because of the stops, the animal cannot be strangled. The stops also work if the animal is caught in the wrong place.
The snares that we have now also give you the ability to discriminate with regard to the animals that you kill. Once you have caught the animals, you can, before you dispatch those that you want to dispatch, release the non-target animals by cutting the snare to free them. The fact that snares are also required to be regularly checked and that every snare must be identified and subject to inspection means that the activity is highly regulated.
I understand why people take issue with this, but it is my opinion and my experience that properly set and managed snares hold the animal to allow its humane dispatch—or its release, if it is not a target animal. There is no reason why non-target animals should end up being killed. I believe that most—in fact, nearly all—people who use snares know that they are taking on a huge responsibility, and they want to ensure that the animals that they catch are not subjected to suffering.
As the minister has rightly said, there are other ways of doing this. For example, those of us who have been out at night with lamps know that foxes become lamp shy, and you can clear a massive area just by turning on the lamp. Thermal sights work, but they are not always appropriate, because you cannot always see the backdrop. Shooting does not always solve everything. Let us be honest: when you fire a gun, you do not always kill what you want to kill. We know that, with snares, you can hold the animal and dispatch it very quickly.
As for the minister’s comment that all of those things can be done at night, I am sure that Jim Fairlie knows that, if you are protecting a lambing field and looking after lambs all day and all night, you do not have the time to spend all night chasing foxes that are trying to work their way in. A snare or cable restraint gives you that ability.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
We also have to decide whether to consider our work programme in private at our next meeting. Do members agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
I hear your comment. My concern is that a lot of money has been allocated or spent and we are not near the target. We will move on to the next question, which comes from the deputy convener, Ben Macpherson.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Before you go on with answering the question, cabinet secretary, could you say a few words so that I can hear whether the interference is still there?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
I am afraid that the interference is still there. I am sorry, cabinet secretary, but we are not hearing all that you want to say, so I will suspend the meeting briefly and see whether we can re-establish the connection to improve the sound.
09:46 Meeting suspended.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
That is a lot better. There is no interference.
We will go back to the question that Monica Lennon posed. Because there has been a bit of a break, could you ask it again, Monica?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Can you confirm that the climate change plan, which we are still awaiting, will have figures in it so that we can see what is required to achieve the targets that are being set?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
I will allow Bob Doris a brief question and, I hope, there will be a brief answer, before we suspend at the end of this first part of the session.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
Okay. I thank Mairi Gougeon for her evidence. I can see that she is struggling with a cough, and I can but hope that she recovers swiftly and is back in Parliament when she is able.
I suspend the meeting until 10:53 exactly, to allow a change of witnesses.
10:48 Meeting suspended.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Edward Mountain
I am now totally confused. Can you clarify how many EV chargers the £30 million fund that was set up to generate EV chargers has delivered?