The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4994 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
You would know about the responsibilities of declarations of interests in the Parliament better than most other MSPs, convener.
To take my point to the next step, you are content that, if you chose to stand to be an MP as an MSP, you would resign. Your proposal would be that you would resign if you were elected as an MP and that you would not have to resign beforehand.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
If an MSP stood for election to become an MP, you are content that, if they then became an MP, they would be given eight days in which to resign. I think that is the period that is being suggested.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
They would not have to resign before the election.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
Alistair Clark is kind of nodding.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
Convener, I will leave it there—to stop it from going round and round—but I think that it needs a little clearer thought. If Covid taught us anything, it is to expect the unexpected. Some of the decisions that we made during Covid were fundamentally flawed from the point of view of democracy.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
Okay. Thank you, convener. Those were just two simple questions, although I am sorry to have put Jackie Dunbar on the spot—not. [Laughter.]
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
May I ask another question, convener?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
Would the next person on a regional list step up, given that the list seats are allocated according to party vote share? We could not go back out and do the whole regional list again. I do have a real concern, though, that regional MSPs should be held to account just the same as constituency MSPs, and I do not know how you would do that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
On the mechanics of the unexpected happening unexpectedly, if I remember rightly, the EMB changed the rules during Covid to allow MSPs to remain in post right up until the day prior to the election, so that, if there was a crisis, we could come back and sit. If it is down to MSPs to make the decision, I point out that, if something happens once the Parliament has been dissolved, there will be no MSPs, but there will be ministers and cabinet secretaries, because they stay in post. How do we get around that? Does some thought need to be given to that issue? I am slightly concerned that the decision would sit with the Government, as it would be the only body with people still in their positions, and those of us who might have a different opinion would not be heard, because we would not exist.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Edward Mountain
I will push back slightly on that. I absolutely agree that MSPs remaining in post might present difficulties. My fear is about how votes would be weighted in an advisory committee. If the votes were weighted as they are in the Parliamentary Bureau, the decision would purely be down to the Government, so, if the Government had an absolute majority, the advisory committee would be a waste of time. Personally, I favour an outside organisation taking control, as Toby James sort of suggested. I will push you slightly to give an answer and then come back to Alistair Clark.