The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4994 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Edward Mountain
Mr Golden, we are about to come to your winding-up remarks on your own amendments, and the minister has come to a natural conclusion. I am conscious that everyone wants to debate the matter, and it is great that they want to do so, but there are some constraints on us.
Mr Golden, I now ask you to wind up, and perhaps you can make the point that you were going to make as part of that. I also ask whether you wish to press or withdraw amendment 141.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Edward Mountain
I am looking to see whether any other members want to say anything before I make a couple of points. I am happy to bring in Monica Lennon first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Edward Mountain
I just want to make a couple of points, if I may.
First, I think that amendment 187 in the name of Bob Doris is interesting, and I understand where it has come from, given the evidence that we have received. My problem with it, however, is that I love tight legislation, because it stops arguments and disagreements.
I just note that there are, I believe, 78 countries in the global south. If I am right, the original definition related to countries that suffer from poor economic development and which perhaps lack democracy and have problems with their location, but it has since been changed to cover countries that have been affected by development—or more developed nations. I have real problems with that; I know of countries that are surrounded by other countries that are part of the global south, but they are not part of the global south themselves. As a result, they are excluded, even though, geographically, they are in the same position.
I therefore urge Mr Doris, as a committee member, to reconsider whether these things are defined correctly in his amendment, and perhaps to lodge a slightly different amendment at stage 3.
I am happy to give way to you, Mr Doris.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Edward Mountain
Will the minister take an intervention?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 4, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 93 disagreed to.
Amendments 132, 181, 182 and 208 to 210 not moved.
Amendment 94 moved—[Sarah Boyack]—and agreed to.
Amendment 183 not moved.
Amendments 95 to 97 moved—[Sarah Boyack]—and agreed to.
Amendment 133 moved—[Maurice Golden].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 4, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 133 disagreed to.
Amendments 98 and 134 not moved.
Amendment 135 moved—[Maurice Golden].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 133 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Edward Mountain
Good morning, and welcome to the 15th meeting of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee in 2024.
Those who are following our agenda for this week will know that we should have been doing stage 2 of the Circular Economy (Scotland) Bill. That has been postponed and will, we hope, take place next week.
Agenda item 1 is a decision on taking business in private. We will consider whether to take item 5, which is a discussion of our work programme, in private. Do we agree to take that item in private?
I am sorry—my mistake. I said item 5 because it was there in writing, but those who are eagle-eyed will know that it should be item 4. Do we agree to take item 4 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Edward Mountain
The second item on the agenda is consideration of a draft statutory instrument, the Transport Partnerships (Transfer of Functions) (Scotland) Order 2024.
I am pleased to welcome Jim Fairlie, the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity, who is joined by his team: Bridget Bryden, the bus regulatory policy team leader at Transport Scotland; Kevin Gibson, a lawyer for the Scottish Government; and Bettina Sizeland, the director of bus accessibility and active travel at Transport Scotland. I hope I have that right. Thank you for joining us today.
The instrument is laid under the affirmative procedure, which means that it cannot come into force unless the Parliament approves it. Following the evidence session, the committee will be invited to consider a motion to recommend that the instrument be approved. I remind everyone that the officials can speak under this item but not in the debate that follows. I invite the minister to make a brief opening statement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Edward Mountain
Thank you very much, minister. I am sorry that we were slightly slow in getting you in—we had programmed the session to begin at quarter past 9—but there was some confusion about the policy note for the instrument. In the past, the committee has commented on how easy it is to understand policy notes and how helpful they are in relation to legislation. The problem was that, in all the explanation that we received—I re-read the information several times last night—we could not identify what a quality partnership or a quality contract is. Could that have been made a bit clearer in the policy note? That is a gentle nudge, minister, and something to think about.