The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6583 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
I will bring in Monica Lennon. I am sorry, Monica, but, due to pressures of time, you get one question and one question only.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
I will come in briefly as I am not understanding something. I think that the suggestion is that the issuing of the permit may have been reckless because it was not properly considered, unless I have got that wrong. Kevin, is that what you are asking about?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
I think that in our first evidence session we heard that an absolute protection against individual workers was wanted and that only companies should hold responsibility. We are getting the impression from today’s panel that that is not a sensible way forward.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Our second item of business is an evidence session on the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill. We are gathering evidence on the general principles of the bill before we report to the Parliament at stage 1. The Parliament has not yet set a stage 1 deadline.
Today, we will take evidence from two panels of witnesses, and these will be our fourth and fifth evidence sessions on the bill. I welcome our first panel: Dr Clare Frances Moran, lecturer and co-director of the Aberdeen centre for constitutional and public international law at the University of Aberdeen; Murdo MacLeod KC; Rachael Weir, head of policy and engagement at the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service; and Iain Batho, head of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service’s wildlife and environmental crime unit. I thank the witnesses for attending the meeting.
My first questions are a gentle warmer into the bank to get you into the swing of answering questions. Do you agree with how ecocide is defined in the bill, or do you have suggestions for how the definition could be strengthened? Does the bill target the appropriate level and type of environmental harm? Does it deal with the issue of future challenges in interpreting the definitions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
I will bring in the deputy convener, Michael Matheson.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Could you give one example of an event that has taken place since 2014 where the provisions in the bill would have been more appropriate than the legislation that we have already?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
I know that Parliament thinks carefully about enacting new legislation. Clare Frances Moran, do you want to say anything on this?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
That is interesting—thank you.
Mark Ruskell has the next questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
It sounds as though there is a back-door escape route here.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Sorry, can I just push a wee bit on this, just so I understand it? I will give an example. Let us say that an aquaculture company wants to use a chemical that has been approved by the veterinary medicines directorate to be used to kill sea lice in salmon pens. The company applies to use it, and uses it as per the permit that is issued by SEPA for an on-use licence for the on-use use of the chemical that has been approved by the veterinary medicines directorate. However, all the starfish, prawns, lobsters and crabs in the area are killed because they are affected by the chemical. Who becomes liable for that? You are sort of saying that no one is liable because if something has been done under permit, everything is hunky-dory. However, in my example, everyone knows that that is what the effect of that chemical has been. I am trying to give you a real example, which, to my mind, raises questions. It seems to me that if the chemical has killed off a substantial number of sea creatures, that could be ecocide in the locality concerned. Does anyone want to pass comment on that? Would you prefer to follow it up in correspondence? Murdo, do you want to comment?