The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5723 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Edward Mountain
Monica, there are lots of follow-up questions. If you want to stay on the subject, please do, but if not, I am tempted to bring in other members.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Edward Mountain
Not on the whole bill, and not for the whole session.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Edward Mountain
Magnus Linklater, now is your moment.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Edward Mountain
I struggle when we talk about natural capital in relation to, for example, Gresham House. It has relatively small landholdings scattered across Scotland, but it becomes quite a big landowner when you put all the holdings together. I am not sure that I have heard how you would deal with that in relating to lotting.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Edward Mountain
The problem with lotting—having done it when I was a surveyor—is that there is quite an art to getting it right.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Edward Mountain
No, I mean if it is lotted in a way that does not achieve the best possible price, and the Government has to compensate the landowner. The compensation could be massive, could it not?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Thank you, convener. I remind members of my entry in the register of members’ interests, which shows that I own part of a wild salmon fishery. I should also point out that I managed fisheries on the Ness and Loch Ness until 2006. My family has a strong connection with Loch Ness, having funded various expeditions to try to find the monster in the 1950s.
The petition has come about because of the work that is being proposed for pump storage in Loch Ness. I accept the importance of pump storage to our net zero demands in Scotland. It provides us with green energy and the ability to have a black start, should there be a complete failure in the national grid.
However, the pump storage at Loch Ness has proven that there are real threats to the environment that we do not yet fully understand. Pump storage will increase the temperature of the water that goes back into the loch. It will invariably require the feeder loch to have its height increased, which is what is being suggested for Loch Ness. That will damage the edge of the loch and cause problems for flora and fauna. The very edge of the loch is probably the most oxygenated area. NatureScot has objected to the proposal.
I know that it would be difficult for the committee to make a recommendation to stop everything when it comes to pump storage, because it is important to Scotland. However, we need to understand what we are doing when it comes to generating electricity.
As a member of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee, I say this with a bit of trepidation, because other members might not thank me for it, but this committee might think it appropriate to refer the petition to the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee so that it can undertake work to ascertain whether there is a problem. I am not volunteering that committee’s services, because I might be killed when I return to it, but it might be an idea.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Edward Mountain
I would like to, convener, if there is time.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Monica Lennon, did you put your hand up?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Edward Mountain
Before I go to Douglas Lumsden, can you just clarify something? I am confused—maybe it is because I have been looking at this for too long. I was told that LNG was an easy fuel to use, that it had been used before, that there was nothing wrong with the design of LNG ships, and that that is why it was chosen for the design of the Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa. That came from CMAL and the owners of the yard at that stage. Everything seems to be turned around now and we are told that it is a very new technology. I think that LNG technology was being used before the ships were being built. It is not new technology, it is just that we have had problems installing it; surely that is the right way to say it.