The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5723 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Edward Mountain
Item 3 is an evidence session on the Great British Energy Bill. The Scottish Government has provided a legislative consent memorandum on the bill, which is a UK Government bill at Westminster. The memorandum, which was lodged on 8 August 2024, set out a holding position on whether the Scottish Government supported provisions in the UK bill that are in areas of devolved competence. The memorandum did not go into much detail at that stage, which was fairly understandable because the bill was in its early stages. The Scottish Government has not provided the substantive update that the committee and the Parliament need to properly engage with the questions of consent in relation to the bill.
Meanwhile, the bill has been proceeding through the UK Parliament. Time for the committee to report was beginning to run short, so, with that in mind, I invited the Scottish Government to give evidence today, despite the fact that we do not have the supplementary memorandum. However, I am very grateful to the acting cabinet secretary for providing an update on the Government’s position on the bill by letter after the invitation was sent.
I would like to put on record that I am sorry that we kept you waiting slightly, cabinet secretary, but the last evidence session ran on. I welcome Gillian Martin, the Acting Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Energy and, from the Scottish Government, Emma Shepherd, the unit head of public and community energy; Norman Macleod, senior principal legal officer; and Natalie Hakeem, the energy engagement team leader. Cabinet secretary, I think that you want to make a short opening statement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Edward Mountain
So the ship was heavier than it was supposed to be?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Edward Mountain
It sort of makes sense, but it does not make sense, because you reduced the passenger numbers, did you not, as a requirement of—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Edward Mountain
Okay. Just looking at it from the outside, I am a little confused that we have ended up with a ferry that was not as originally specified but has just been accepted in. Whose agreement was it just to accept what was delivered? Was that yours, or was it the Scottish Government’s?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Edward Mountain
Hold on, now you are adding another dimension. Just tell me this: the ship sits deeper in the water—is that right?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Edward Mountain
I will go back to the original question. From what you said, Jim, the ferry did not meet the original specifications that were laid out when it was supposed to be built.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Edward Mountain
Which is quite a critical thing, I would suggest. Who made the decision to accept that ferry with that built into it? Was it CMAL, Transport Scotland or the Scottish Government?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Edward Mountain
So, maybe, maybe not. I am not sure that I am any clearer on that, so I might have to come back to you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Edward Mountain
Jim Anderson, to save you looking it all up, I think that I have the figures to hand. The vessel was meant to have a dead weight of 878 tonnes, with a tolerance of 10 tonnes. There were penalties of £5,000 per tonne for falling below that weight, up to a maximum of £250,000, which would have meant that it was 50 tonnes below the weight, down to 818 tonnes. At that point, the boat should have been cancelled, according to the original contract, because it did not meet the specification.
What I was trying to drive at is that the boat can carry less than was originally agreed—less than the contract was set up for—which means that it is not doing what it was expected to achieve. That, therefore, raises the question of whether you have value for money, in my mind—especially now, as you can have fewer passengers and fewer vehicles. It appears to me that we have ended up with a boat that does not meet the original contract, however it has panned out. We have not got what we paid for, and we paid considerably more than we thought we were going to have to pay. To me, the whole thing seems to be a complete confusion. I am going to leave it there, because I think that I have made my point.
Kevin Hobbs, I think that you specifically asked for the anchor chain to be retested during the trials—unless I have got that wrong. [Interruption.] I am being told that it was Jim Anderson who asked for it, so my knowledge of that was wrong.
Jim, you asked for the anchor chain to be retested, and there was going to be a quick fix, which would allow it to be workable by February this year, which is after it goes into service. We were told that anchor chains are not that vital but that they are part of a safety feature. Has it been fixed or will it be fixed before the vessel starts carrying passengers?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Edward Mountain
Okay. I think that the latest that we have heard is that, subject to the toilets being fixed, the vessel will come into use on 13 January. It will then have to come out of service again to get the anchor fixed. How long does that take?