The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 8272 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Edward Mountain
Yes, it is definitely better, because we can hear you. Off you go.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Edward Mountain
You wrote to the committee on 15 September, saying that significant milestones for the committee had been met, that there was increased confidence in the delivery timetable and that the project remained within the £185 million budget. You basically said that everything was fine and that we should not worry about it. At that stage, if it had been dry-docked in August, you must have known that there were significant issues. You have admitted that yourself.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Edward Mountain
Were you comfortable on 15 October?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Edward Mountain
Do you not think that it would have been appropriate to let committee members know that the letter that you had written to them in September was factually incorrect?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Edward Mountain
When did you complete that work?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Edward Mountain
I have to say that that does not fill me with any confidence at all. I have heard the same thing being said before and we have ended up with increased costs. What we know is that CalMac has insured the Glen Sannox for £57 million. That is what it will cost to rebuild it. We are already up to a cost of £197.5 million for the Glen Rosa, which is, by anyone’s calculations, about four times what it should have cost, and we still do not know that it will be delivered.
I have to say that, in some ways, I will be glad when I leave Parliament and I do not have to continue to listen to this, because I am not convinced by any of the arguments that you have given. I will leave it there. I invite Michael Matheson, the deputy convener, to ask his questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Edward Mountain
Good morning, and welcome to the 12th meeting in 2026 of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee. We have received apologies from Monica Lennon.
Our first item of business is a decision on taking items 5 to 8 in private. Item 5 is consideration of the evidence that we will hear on the legislative consent memorandums for the Railways Bill; item 6 is consideration of the evidence that we will hear from Ferguson Marine (Port Glasgow) Ltd; item 7 is consideration of the evidence that we will hear from Environmental Standards Scotland; and item 8 is consideration of a letter from the Presiding Officer regarding the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill. Do we agree to take these items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Edward Mountain
But the price would go up.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Edward Mountain
Thank you, cabinet secretary. Our briefing tells us that it is a fairly complicated bill, which might be an understatement. There is an LCM and a supplementary LCM and there are likely to be several more LCMs before the process is complete. Will you reiterate why you asked the committee specifically to consider this before we had all the LCMs and other details in front of us?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Edward Mountain
It sounds as if we are not going to repeat the stage where we were building the ferry before the design had been approved, which is where we were when we started the scheme with the Glen Rosa and the Glen Sannox.
I have a couple of questions. I know that Duncan Anderson is not particularly happy to look at history, but I remember David Tydeman coming in and saying that Ferguson Marine would always be 20 to 25 per cent more expensive than any other yard when it came to building ships. Was that wrong?