The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6078 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
So, over the period of an hour, you would probably be delivering more slippery gas than non-slippery gas, in layman’s term.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I think that John Andresen wanted to come in—I do not know if you saw that, Sarah Boyack, as Nigel Holmes was very quick off the mark.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Douglas, you want to come in on that point.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you for clarifying that. Michael Matheson has some questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Mark Ruskell has a brief question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Sarah Boyack has a final question is for one panel member. Nigel Holmes has had quite a run, so go for whoever you like.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Will price—the price of hydrogen compared with the price of electricity—limit development?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
With the exception of Mark Symes, who wants to move to green hydrogen straight away because he thinks—I realise that I am putting words in his mouth—that that will be better, I think that you are all saying that, realistically, we will need to use a bit of blue hydrogen to start with, and that we will move towards green hydrogen by 2045, which I think is our target. For how long will we need to have a mix before we move over totally to green hydrogen? I am not clear about that. Are we talking about five years or 10 years? What timeframe are we looking at?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Simon, blue or green?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Item 4 is consideration of another type 1 consent notification relating to a proposed UK statutory instrument. The regulations in question would make two key changes to existing provision on extended producer responsibility for waste electrical and electronic equipment. First, they would extend the term “producer” to include online marketplaces, and secondly, they would create a new category of equipment for vapes and electronic cigarettes to ensure that producers are responsible for the waste disposal costs.
On 22 April, the Acting Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Energy notified the committee of the proposed UK SI. As with the previous instrument, the key issue is whether we agree with the Scottish Government that the UK Government should legislate in this devolved area in this way. If we are content for consent to be given, the committee will write to the Scottish Government accordingly. We have the option to pose questions or to take up any issues with regard to the date and relevant developments.
If members do not have any views on the matter, we will move to the substantive question. Is the committee content that the provisions set out in the notification should be made in the proposed UK statutory instrument?
Members indicated agreement.