The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6078 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I thank the panel members for their evidence and for helping us as we look at the future of hydrogen.
I briefly suspend the meeting to allow a changeover of witnesses. I ask members to be back here at five past 11.
10:58 Meeting suspended.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
One issue, though, is the fact that, as soon as the electricity that is generated across the Highlands hits the national grid, the price goes through the roof and it prices hydrogen out. I come from an area that seems to have a proliferation of wind farms, pylons and all the problems that go with that and a community that does not seem to benefit from it. Some regionality in hydrogen production would seem quite good where there is wind power.
The other issue is water. We are in a situation where just about all of Scotland is potentially in a drought situation, yet we seem to be concentrating on hydrogen from water on the east coast when, traditionally, it has always been the west coast that has had more water. Do we need more joined-up thinking about all those points?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Is this a legacy of the fact that we did not plan where all the wind farms were going? Are we going to have everything dotted around the landscape because we do not have joined-up thought on the whole system of electricity and power generation? Mercedes, do you want to come back in on that? I am also happy to bring anyone else in.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Whatever the option is, it appears that putting it into the national grid and buying it off the national grid to create hydrogen is not the way forward.
Mark Ruskell has a question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Perfect.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Douglas, can I make the suggestion? That might be outwith the technical competence of the panel of witnesses, which I am sure is very varied. We ought to write to SGN and find out how easy it would be to transport hydrogen. Would it use steel pipelines like the one that runs from Aberdeen to Inverness—I know about that because it comes through the farm—or would it use plastic ones?
We should ask it that, because it is clear that, if we move to hydrogen, we will have to transport it. It would be useful to know how easy it would be to do that. Are you happy with that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I do not know why I got that wrong—Statera Energy Ltd. I also welcome: Bill Ireland, the chief executive officer for Logan Energy Ltd; Mark Bradley, the hydrogen director in Scottish Power; David Amos, the managing director of PlusZero; and Tim Dumenil, the head of business development for Storegga, who is attending remotely.
At the outset, I refer members to my register of interests, which declares that I am a proprietor of salmon fishings on the River Spey and am a member of the Spey Fishery Board. The board, which is a statutory body, has recently considered a planning application for a hydrogen plant at Marypark, which was submitted by Storegga. As the plant would take water out of the River Spey, the board had to consider the options and its responsibilities regarding protecting the fisheries management of the catchment, and, on that basis, has objected to the application on the ground that it would take water out of the river, which the board feels is inappropriate. I hope that that is a full declaration.
I am going to go straight to questions. The first question is always an easy one—I like to think so, anyway—as it involves asking witnesses for their views on how things are working at the moment. You will each get a chance to answer it, starting with Bill Ireland—I am giving you plenty of warning that I am coming to you.
Project willow does not advocate the use of green or blue hydrogen, and the UK and Scottish Governments have said that it needs a twin-track approach. Do you think that that approach is correct or do you think that more attention should be paid to green or blue hydrogen?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I think that Douglas Lumsden has the next questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Sorry—do you want to come in, Mark?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
It is probably fair to say that people find it particularly difficult to stomach when, if there is too much electricity so power cannot be generated, constraint payments are given to people with wind farms. That power could perhaps be diverted not to massive battery storage sites but to hydrogen sites or wherever we wanted it to go.
Tim Dumenil wants to come in.
09:45