The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6078 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
As no other member wishes to speak, I will say a few words and maybe ask a few questions.
Amendment 23, in the name of Tim Eagle, states that new management plans do not have to be produced until a year after purchase. I wonder whether the cabinet secretary will support that, given that Glen Prosen was purchased in 2022, and there is still no management plan for it. I understand the need for that requirement, but I am not sure the Government has a great record in that regard.
On the duration of management plans, I agree with Tim Eagle that 20 years is probably more reasonable, because land management, especially basic land management, takes a long time. I think that the timescales for forest management plans are even longer than that, so 20 years seems entirely reasonable.
We heard about the cost of production in our evidence sessions; estimates varied, but I think that we settled on a figure in the region of £15,000 to £20,000 for small land management plans. If you have to redo the plan every 10 years, that is a huge burden on relatively small holdings of land, and I have concerns about that.
I listened to Bob Doris talk about plans being accessible, and I have some sympathy with having accessible plans and there being a single place to find them. However, I can see that growing arms and legs. One has only to look at “Who Owns Scotland” to see that the best way of defining land is through a map-based system, but the costs would be huge if there were maps for every area.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I will give way in a minute—I will just finish my train of thought.
The cabinet secretary’s view is that she does not want land management plans to become formulaic, and nor does anyone on the committee. However, I am very concerned that, if an online format is used, the plans will become formulaic in order to fit the website that they go on.
Mr Doris, did you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I call Mercedes Villalba to speak to Rhoda Grant’s amendment 341 and any other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Edward Mountain
It is just a brief question. If you were considering granting further land into crofting, which of the three bits of crofting legislation would you bring it under? One thing that needs to be done to make crofting work is a reform of crofting legislation. Are you not in danger, by increasing crofting per se, of further muddying the water as far as the legislation is concerned?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Mark Bradley, we have heard that, once you release the electricity in the National Grid, national pricing comes into effect, and there are costs with producing hydrogen around a loss of power from electricity. Is it better to site hydrogen production close to where the electricity is generated, or do you think that Grangemouth is the right place?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Okay. I think that there is unanimity that the approach should be a mixture of both to start with, followed by a drift towards green hydrogen, which is ultimately where we want to end up.
What is the best site for making that hydrogen? Is it Grangemouth or is it outwith Grangemouth?
I should have apologised to you at the outset that, as there are five of you, you will not necessarily all get to answer. You should wave or try to catch my eye and I will bring you in. If you really do not want to answer a question, you can look the other way. However, if you all look the other way, I will bring in one of you to answer the question. Those are your options. Lewis Elder, you indicated that you want to answer my question.
09:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
So, you would pop it all at Grangemouth?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
Tim Dumenil, you wanted to come in.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I understand that, but I think that there are people across the Highlands who feel that they are the battery that powers the motor of the UK but that they get very little from it.
Bill Ireland, you want to come in.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Edward Mountain
I encourage people to be brief, because I have to get Douglas Lumsden in and we have another panel of witnesses, who will need some time as well.