Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 24 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 6078 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Edward Mountain

The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.

Amendment 337 disagreed to.

Amendment 396 moved—[Tim Eagle].

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Edward Mountain

I call amendment 411 in the name of Tim Eagle, already debated with amendment 53. I point out that, due to pre-emption, if amendment 411 is agreed to, I cannot call amendment 87, which has already been debated in the group on the establishment, appointment and functions of the land and communities commissioner.

Amendment 411 moved—[Tim Eagle].

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Edward Mountain

The question is, that amendment 411 be agreed to. Are we agreed?

Members: No.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Edward Mountain

I call amendment 88 in the name of Tim Eagle, already debated with—[Interruption.] I am sorry—that was my mistake. I call amendment 87 in the name of Tim Eagle, already debated with amendment 14.

Amendment 87 not moved.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Edward Mountain

The question is, that amendment 396 be agreed to. Are we agreed?

Members: No.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Edward Mountain

The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.

Amendment 396 disagreed to.

Amendments 33 and 338 not moved.

Amendment 339 moved—[Rhoda Grant].

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Edward Mountain

I call amendment 341, in the name of Rhoda Grant. Rhoda Grant to move—sorry. The amendment has already been debated with amendment 389. I almost caught myself out that time, Rhoda.

Amendment 341 moved—[Rhoda Grant].

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Edward Mountain

The question is, that amendment 341 be agreed to. Are we agreed?

Members: No.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Edward Mountain

The result of the division is: For 6, Against 0, Abstentions 1.

Amendment 34 agreed to.

Amendment 36 moved—[Mairi Gougeon].

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Edward Mountain

I do not think that people who are receiving payments under the farm payments schemes are necessarily receiving them for delivering community good. They are receiving them to cover requirements of regulations, such as those that relate to passports for animals, livestock density, the stocking rate and the use of fertiliser and when it can be used on land. Those are the sorts of things that people receive payments for. However, the suggestion in the amendments is that we go way beyond that with the public interest. It gives me some concern that we would put burdens on people who would not be rewarded.

I listened carefully to what was said on the amendment in the name of Mercedes Villalba on tax residency. I am not sure that I understand where someone would have to reside for tax purposes in order to own more than a certain amount of land—would it be Scotland or the United Kingdom? There are two different tax rates and, indeed, different tax codes to show whether someone is resident in Scotland or the United Kingdom. I am not sure that the amendment is competent because I do not understand that point.