The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2871 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Of course it would be, but I think that a request for a minister to give a statement will often be agreed to by the bureau.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Welcome back. The next item of business is evidence, over two panels, on the Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill. I welcome our first panel. Sheriff David Mackie is chairperson of the hearings system working group, Fiona Duncan is independent strategic adviser to The Promise Scotland, and Fraser McKinlay is chief executive at The Promise Scotland. Thank you very much for joining us today. I apologise for our lateness in getting to you—I know that you sat through the previous session.
I will kick off the questions, which I will direct to Sheriff Mackie first of all. There are positive points in your submission on the bill, but there are also some criticisms—that is a theme throughout the submissions. Your criticisms are quite stark. You speak about the bill lacking ambition. You state:
“Some … provisions seem unnecessarily complex to the point of being, at times, unintelligible and inaccessible to anyone who is not a lawyer.”
You also speak about the bill being a “Lost opportunity”.
You can talk about some of the positives if you want to, but I particularly want to look at what we as a committee need to scrutinise and what deficiencies you see in the bill.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
You said there has been a marked increase in engagement in recent days and weeks. Is that from Scottish Government ministers or officials?
09:45Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Your report made a number of recommendations. As you say, some have filtered through, but the majority have not. How do you feel about the work that went into producing the report, given that the bill is an opportunity that was not taken to encompass that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
That was perfect. I have never had witnesses respond so positively to my polite suggestions for brevity.
We will move on to questions from John Mason.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I will bring Mr McKinlay in, but your evidence is that the bill will add to the complexity, which is not particularly reassuring in relation to passing the tests that you have just spoken about.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
You were already a good witness, Sheriff Mackie, but, by mentioning Elgin, you have just gone up even further in my estimation. Well done on that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Mr McKinlay might have pre-empted what I was going to say. You are giving us detailed and valuable answers, which is what we need. However, there are a lot of committee members, so, although we are at fault for starting late, it would be good if we can constrain some of the answers, because we have a second panel. However, do not limit what you want to get across—it is vital.
We will move to questions from Bill Kidd.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Sheriff Mackie, may I take advantage of your being here to tease out a couple more things in relation to your evidence? We have already discussed some of the language that is used and said that it is difficult to follow. Is it the case that the principle around the language is correct but that it just needs redrafting, or are the problems more significant? Is it simply a case of changing some of the words and how things are written, or is there a more fundamental problem, particularly in relation to section 90 of the bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Ms Galli, because you are joining remotely, I would like you to indicate if you want to come in. The Law Society has an interest in this point and your sub-committee has been looking at the bill. Do you have anything to add?
I understand that you also want to make a brief opening remark about where you are giving evidence from today.