The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2871 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
There must be only two or, potentially, three Cabinet meetings. Have you not been invited to present a paper to Cabinet yet?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
We will come to Ms McKerron in a minute.
Are you saying that you cannot because you are not allowed to, or that you will not? I am not asking what your decision will be, although I would like you to tell us, if you will. I simply want to know when the Cabinet is going to discuss this.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Do you know when, but you cannot tell the committee, or do you not know when?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I think that you can. I think that being called before a committee gives you the opportunity to do that, and that is why members are asking these questions.
If we are not going to get an answer, other members will want to come in. Before they do so, I will ask briefly about the concerns that were raised last night about the undemocratic nature of the potential decision not to lodge a financial resolution. Do you understand the gravity of the decision that you would be taking not to lodge a financial resolution? It would be the first time in the history of devolution that the Government has sought to strike down a bill using that procedure, rather than listening to the will of Parliament, which overwhelmingly supported the bill at stage 1.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I know, but it will effectively be done.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
So it cannot inform your decision. You will not have those numbers.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
But nothing in the bill stops that. The bill provides a universal opportunity for people to be given the chance to go on these trips, but there is no mandatory obligation for them to go. I have to say, Mr Adam, that the bill is about a lot more than zip wires and canoeing. [Interruption.] Well, you might find that funny. I find that—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Well, I do not want it to be an issue—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
I want to go back to the point about unanswered questions and queries. You are right that you stipulated those questions when you appeared before us in our stage 1 proceedings and in the stage 1 debate, but they were not of significant enough concern to you at that time to vote against the bill.
What Pam Duncan-Glancy just said is surely the crux of the issue. You could lodge a financial resolution for the bill in the knowledge that we may never spend a single penny of that financial resolution because the bill does not get satisfactorily amended at stage 2 or stage 3. Is not the best approach to give Parliament the opportunity to try to hone the bill into something that we can get majority support for and, therefore, lodge the financial resolution with the caveat that the Government, if it has enough support from other parties, can vote it down at stage 3 if the amendments at stage 2 do not suffice?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Douglas Ross
Because any figure is too much?