The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3483 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
The way I listened to it on Sunday was that you were saying that the ask potentially came from Professor Jay or someone else. Do you accept that there was not an ask for clarification to be sought in relation to the strategic group minutes, because it was a Scottish Government response to Professor Jay’s letter?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
It was her preferred route because she was offered only two routes: a response from the cabinet secretary or that more public route of a clarification in the minutes. Were you briefed to say on “The Sunday Show” that
“There was an ask for clarification to be sought in relation to the strategic group minutes”?
You actually said it twice, and I can give you both quotes. It was a very particular quote, and it stuck with me. Were you told that that was the line to take? We have all been given lines to take, so was that what you were told to put across?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
As Mr Kidd mentioned victims and survivors, I invite George Adam to come in, as he wants to extend that line of questioning.
10:15Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
You have said that you are not in the practice of making private calls for Government business. Did you say that you think that the time that we are discussing was the only time that you have ever done that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
But would you welcome the clarity that any investigation would bring? Would you have any concerns?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
I am not doubting that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you very much, cabinet secretary, and thanks to your officials. I appreciate your time today.
11:18 Meeting suspended.Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you very much, Professor Jay. On behalf of the committee, I say how much we appreciate your agreeing to join us at short notice and your answers today. I think that there has also been an offer through the Government for you to meet committee members and other spokespeople—we are extremely grateful for your doing that.
I wish you well with your endeavours. It is important work that you have to do to get answers for victims who have not had answers for so much time. We all wish you well in your work.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Interestingly, I asked a question in Parliament and was provided with that detail.
Are you aware of paragraph 8.13 of the ministerial code?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
That is helpful.
Professor Jay, you will also be aware that a quote you gave in January of this year was used in the chamber by the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs. There have been a number of urgent questions about that, and correspondence between you and the Government that was released last week showed that you sought a clarification, and that a clarification was made to the minute of a body of which you are a member. However, the Official Report of our Parliament still says this:
“Is Mr Kerr aware of the work led by Professor Alexis Jay, who was the chair of an independent inquiry into child sexual abuse in England and Wales and who currently sits on our national strategic group? She shares my view and has put on the record and stated to the media that she does not support further inquiries into child sexual abuse and exploitation, given the significant time and resource already spent in the review that she led, the Casey audit and other reviews. She says that it is now time that
‘people should just get on with it’.”
Liam Kerr, in responding to that intervention, said:
“The cabinet secretary has put that on the record”—[Official Report, 16 September 2025; c 31.]
and that is still on the record of our Parliament. It is the only such reference in that debate. Do you think that a clarification that was made to the minutes of the strategic group should also be clarified in our Parliament’s Official Report?