Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 31 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3160 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Douglas Ross

Do you think that the only reason why it was published this time is perhaps that the cabinet secretary came in front of our committee and said that she would share it with us? The SQA was kind of boxed in at that point, was it not?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Douglas Ross

You should never be put in that position. We have discussed this before: you are volunteers. You represent your fellow history teachers. Surely the SQA would want that survey published and to be out there in public so that it can be held to account and so that it can improve. You should not in any way feel regret for having done that—the ones who should be regretting it are the ones who put you in that position in the first place.

I am sorry, Kirsty—I know that you wanted to come in on Pam Duncan-Glancy’s question, too.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Douglas Ross

Fiona Robertson mentioned variation across other subjects and used examples of subjects where there had been a drop, but there was nothing like that.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Douglas Ross

This a question for you all. Has the issue been resolved as far as you think it is going to be resolved? The SQA seems to think that, since it was peer reviewed by someone from Wales, its independent review is the end of the matter. The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills has suggested that it is. However, she said in the chamber a couple of weeks ago that she was going to continue communication with you and with members who are interested.

Ultimately, a cohort of students went into that exam in good faith and, based on the communication that I had have had, came out at the other side without the marks that were expected of them. Do you think that we need to look at the marks that were allocated and reassess last year’s exam paper and the results?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Douglas Ross

We will definitely come on to that.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Douglas Ross

Thank you for sharing that. As I said, we have looked back a lot on last year’s exam and the impact that it had on students. What impact is the situation having on your current cohort of students, who will face the exam very soon? Have the “Understanding standards” events delivered what they should have delivered? I understand that many questions were put into the chat because people were not able to get involved, but they have gone unanswered. Is that correct? Are you and your fellow history teachers still seeking answers to many outstanding issues just months away from your students taking the exam?

12:30  

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Douglas Ross

I will follow up on that with few more points. A couple of weeks ago, at portfolio questions on education and skills, the cabinet secretary said in the chamber that she had had further discussions with you, and it is clear that there will be more.

Is the Scottish Government Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills aware that you have now written four drafts of an apology to the SQA, which have not been accepted? Is she aware that the SQA is looking for 13 further redactions? Is the cabinet secretary fully apprised of that?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Douglas Ross

Kirsty, do you have anything to add?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Scottish Youth Parliament

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Douglas Ross

Three members still want to come in and we are up against the clock a little bit. It would be good if members could ask short questions and get succinct answers, if that is possible. We can go over time a little bit, but I know that the witnesses also have other things to do today.

John Mason is next.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Douglas Ross

My understanding of that is that there was a question based on something that had been removed from the syllabus. It is almost as though a bank of questions had been written years ago and the question had been pulled out of that bank, but there had been no quality assurance before it went into the exam paper. Is that what you are trying to explain to us? Is that correct?