The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3483 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
How do you know that if you were not involved?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Could you share that with the committee?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
It says:
“A Government official should be present for all discussions relating to Government business.”
Why was a Government official not present for that call?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Okay, thank you.
In response to Mr O’Kane, you said that the Government had not asked you about your quote before it was used in the Parliament. However, you were emailed on 12 September to be told about Mr Kerr’s amendment. The email, which is from a civil servant, also stated:
“Our Minister will NOT support these amendments”.
The email added:
“Highlighting not for any proactive response but I am mindful you may be contacted for a view.”
Were you emailed about any other amendments? There were hundreds of other amendments to the bill. Was that the only amendment that the Scottish Government proactively emailed you about?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Okay, thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
You mentioned your review and the recommendations. Those were for England and Wales, but one of the recommendations was for mandatory reporting. Where are we on that in Scotland? What is the Scottish Government’s view on mandatory reporting?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
I have a couple of points to conclude this evidence session. In your opening statement or in answer to an early question you reflected on Liam Kerr’s urgent question on 19 November and you said that, in hindsight, you should have provided the correspondence that he was looking for then. Why did it take three more weeks for that to come out through FOI? There were other opportunities, such as answering an urgent question from Meghan Gallacher. Indeed, I had an urgent question on the same day that the Government released the information.
If you reflected that you should have done that when that was called for on 19 November, why did you not do it then?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
I can assist with that. The mechanism is to make a statement that is then included in the Official Report. That has been requested of you for some time. Professor Jay has now said at this committee that she would welcome that. Is that something that you will now commit to?
09:45Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Will we get a response to that quickly? If there is a time limit, there are procedures to suspend standing orders. The fact that the time limit has been exceeded is down to an interpretation by you and others that a correction was not required. If the person involved has said that they would welcome such a correction, I do not think that there should be a time bar on that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Can your officials help us? Was it Government officials or political special advisers who inserted that note?