The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2278 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
So, is Professor Gillies wrong in her assumption?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You have already blamed Mr Fotheringham for that, so you are reiterating that. That is fine.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
He will, we hope, answer that tomorrow. However, that is the reason why you, as chair of the court, did it—because the former principal was telling you that he could provide that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I am sorry, but how could any director of finance not remember a principal telling the university and the wider public that the university was moving into a surplus position when you have just told us that it was clear then that it was not? That was the total opposite of what you are telling us that you believed, but you sat on your hands and claim not to have heard the principal saying that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Dr McGeorge, there is a theme in your evidence: you say “we”, share responsibility and often move it on to others. You did so with Mr Fotheringham very early in the meeting, and just a moment ago, you said that other decisions meant that the right people were not on courts.
You held one of the most senior positions, are one of the most qualified people and have different qualifications. A lot of your evidence seems to involve shifting the blame away from you. The role of chief operating officer and company secretary was one of the university’s most senior positions, and you have been at the university longer than anyone else on the panel that is in front of us. You have been at the university longer than the total for the other witnesses combined. Of the witnesses today, you are perhaps most to blame. Do you accept that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Of our witnesses today, do you accept that you are most to blame?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Did you provide all information requested?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
How about you, Dr McGeorge?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Good. I wanted to get that on the record.
On the covenant, how can two very senior individuals—one is the director of finance and one about whom the Gillies report says
“was at the centre of”
all
“the financial management of the University”—
not know that a breach is reportable to the Funding Council?
I will go to you first, Dr McGeorge.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You are at the centre of financial management at the university. You are not only the chief operating officer but the company secretary. You are legally bound to alert the institution to such issues. Is it not only an appalling failure but almost a criminal failure that you were negligent in that way?