Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 11 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2871 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

—as there had been for some time.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Were you happy that it published the article the night before the meeting?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

It was January.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Okay.

One comment that was issued by the SQA was this:

“We asked SATH to remove any part of the survey results that identified members of SQA staff.”

Do you stand by that comment?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

The comment was this:

“We asked SATH to remove any part of the survey results that identified members of SQA staff.”

Do you stand by that comment?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Stop there. Ms Stewart, is Mr Booth correct?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

No, they were not. I have the email that you sent to Kirsty MacDonald at 9:57 am on Friday 20 December 2024. Do you say at any point in that email that you are acting on behalf of the union?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

It is not clear at all.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Is it the trade union, though? That communication does not mention a member of staff.

Another redaction that you asked for was point 5 in the final comment on page 56 of the survey, which says:

“More openness

Many appointees seem fearful of criticising the SQA due to reports of other appointees having been removed from marking duties for expressing critical views.”

That does not mention an individual member of staff that a union would be concerned about.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

“Higher History Review 2024”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Ross

Okay, I am going to read out a final three comments. They are all redactions requested by you, whether through the union or not. When I read them out, can you tell me whether they name or identify one individual member of SQA?

You asked for a redaction on page 52 of the survey results where it says,

“needs an independent review … need to get rid of incompetent leaders and team managers”.

Does that identify any individual member of SQA staff—yes or no?