The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3483 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Does the Government have a view, or do you have a personal view on mandatory reporting?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Bill Kidd, would you mind if I first move on to the next subject? I want to try to keep us to topic.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Can you tell us what their involvement or input was?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Based on what I have just read out, do you think that that could be a breach of the ministerial code? I am not asking you to judge whether you breached the code but, on the basis of that alone, could that be something that needs to be investigated?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Unless I am reading it wrong, it says:
“A Government official should be present for all discussions relating to Government business.”
You have confirmed that it was Government business, because you were contacting Professor Jay as the cabinet secretary—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
—on Government business. You have just confirmed that you were calling as the Cabinet Secretary for—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
Professor Jay, on Mr Greer’s opening question about the clarification in the group minutes, did that suggestion come from you? Did you think that that would be the appropriate body for that clarification? Did someone in the Scottish Government suggest, “You have raised your concerns; this is the vehicle that we suggest for changing that”?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
I am just wondering how you felt. The letter to all MSPs, including you, finished by saying:
“Please do the right thing and vote to remove Angela Constance from her position. This will give the many victims of this barbaric form of abuse some belief and trust in the process going forward.”
Are you worried that they will not have belief and trust in the process going forward if you remain in post?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Douglas Ross
In terms of that option, Professor Jay confirmed that she was given two options: a letter from you in response to her letter, which would not necessarily be public but could be released under freedom of information some time later, or corrections to the relevant minutes. Why did no Government civil servant or special adviser suggest or offer a correction to the Official Report? At any point, was it discussed by anyone in Government that you might need to correct the Official Report?