The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2278 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You allowed—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Some, or—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
A member of your court has wanted that view to be expressed publicly because they were so frustrated about your convenership of that meeting. You are saying that they are wrong and that you never shut down questions about finances, saying that they were operational and not allowing them to be asked.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Should a chair of the court, who has accepted in response to Willie Rennie that they did not have financial training and whose previous experience was with organisations far smaller than a university, ever stop questions being asked at court? Should you not allow everything to be asked and allow everything to be out in public?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You said that you had those discussions with him. Did those discussions include a pay-off and an offer for her to go on trips around the world funded by the university?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I understand that. I am sure that things were respectful between you and her. However, I just want to know the details of those discussions. Were offers made for her to go on trips and to receive a substantial pay-off?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
I cannot believe that you can say that with a straight face. It is very clear. Why, when Professor Gillespie, as the principal and vice-chancellor, instructed you to remove someone from the university would you offer that person the opportunity to go and work for the university abroad? It was clearly an enticement to leave. You have just told us that there was conflict between the two of them. With that conflict, how could you possibly believe that the arrangement was to benefit the university if the principal did not believe what that individual was advocating? Those trips were to get someone to leave—can you not accept that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Do you accept that that is how it could be and, I think, would be perceived?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
It would have been valuable if she had been continuing, but it was part of an exit package, which is different.
Do you accept that there is a perception among some people that the discussions that you had without prejudice were enticements rather than how you describe them? Would it be criminal to use the university’s money to buy someone off in that way?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Douglas Ross
The policy is quite explicit that you are responsible and that you do need to sign that off, Ms Millar. Were you not aware of the policy?