The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2871 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
If it was a paper. You are saying that papers would not be normal, but was there an agenda item that was then removed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Okay. Why was there not a normal paper on the finance of the university when you were discussing a recovery plan?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
John Mason has a question.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
I wonder whether, 10 years on from the work of campaigners such as Beth Morrison and Kate Sanger, we would not be having to raise these issues again if the figures were more in the public domain.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Just before I call Mr Greer, I want to go back to Ms Duncan-Glancy’s point about reporting. Some of the written and, indeed, oral evidence that we have received suggests that 24 hours is perhaps too tight a period in which to produce a full report, and that it should be produced the next school day. My concern is that, if something were to happen on a Friday, a family would not know for the whole weekend why their child was very upset. An incident could happen at the end of June on the last day of term and the family would not get anything until after the holidays. In my view, that would be completely inappropriate. Do you agree with that, despite some of the unions thinking that it should be the next school day? There would be significant problems if we were talking about, say, a holiday or weekend.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Thank you. We move to questions from Jackie Dunbar.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
When the issue was raised, did you start to speak among yourselves—officials and ministers—to say, “We may have a problem here”?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Yes, but then Mr Maconachie from the SFC confirmed that those discussions had taken place at its board meeting earlier this year. Therefore, board members of the SFC have said to the leadership of the SFC that there are concerns that the funding council is just a conduit for the Government and is not acting impartially with regard to the Government. As the education secretary, what do you say about that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
Yes, but I am still unsure about this. The figure that you are going to be spending is bigger than the figure that you are getting.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Douglas Ross
On that point, there was reporting that the Scottish Government had paid Deloitte £900,000 to look at the financial health of Dundee university. Was the reporting correct that Deloitte did not even see the recovery plan before it was rejected?