The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2871 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
The third instrument is being considered under the negative procedure. If members have no comments, does the committee agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations on the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
The final instrument is also being considered under the negative procedure. As with the second instrument, this SSI was considered yesterday by the DPLR Committee, which again made some drafting recommendations. If members have no comments, does the committee agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations on the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
That concludes the public part of our proceedings. The committee will now move into private session to consider the final items on its agenda.
12:31 Meeting continued in private until 13:08.Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Everyone has got a different opinion from you at the moment.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
And none of those people want you to change your plans. We will come back to a number of those issues.
I bring in Jackie Dunbar.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Professor Miller, because Mr Adam started speaking about some of the local area around the University of the West of Scotland, I note that this week or at the end of last week the “Complete University Guide” annual league table was published and the University of the West of Scotland Paisley was the lowest ranked of all the Scottish universities on that list. How do you respond to that and what will you do to try to improve your position for next year?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Given the massive cuts that you are overseeing at the University of Edinburgh, do you think that an area where we could see a reduction is your salary?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
No. We need you to answer for the Official Report.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
You had an overall score of 42 and a UK ranking of 128 and, as I say, you were lowest out of 15 Scottish universities, given that two are not part of it. Do you want us to accept that, because of the metrics that are used, you will always perform poorly in this? Although you say that you are not chasing some of these metrics, this is a well-respected guide. You may not agree with everything that it does, but students who are looking for their places in the future will look at it and be concerned that the University of the West of Scotland is so low down the rankings not just for Scotland but for the UK.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Douglas Ross
Do you think that you should do something differently, given that such a vote is unprecedented in your time as principal? Our understanding from the submission that you have seen is that on 26 March the senate expressed deep concern about the impact of the proposed cut of £140 million over 18 months and that subsequently, the no confidence vote was taken because the senate’s concerns had not been addressed by the university executive. It was not a knee-jerk reaction. There were almost two months from one meeting to another in which there was an opportunity for you to address the concerns of the senate. Clearly, the senate believed that nothing had been done because it went ahead with the vote and stated that it had no confidence in you and the executive.