The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2871 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
This problem is not an issue of conflict with the UK Government; it is because part of the bill—sections 1 and 2, and section 10—amend the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. You are saying that the UK Government could maybe write off some of the legislation—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
That is what I am saying. Your answer seemed to be about the UNCRC in general rather than about this bill, which could be sorted with amendments at stage 2 without any further involvement from the UK Government.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
No. I am sorry, minister, but the committee has received that evidence, and you said that you have followed our evidence. If I was in your shoes, I would have thought that this was clearly an area that I was going to be challenged on. You cannot come here and say that you will now look into it. I would really like to know now why your engagement, in COSLA’s eyes, has been so poor with regard to a bill on which I would have expected it to be working hand in glove with you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Sorry—I am lost now. How can you say that the ministerial code prevents you from doing something before the bill is presented to Parliament but, in the same answer, also say that you engaged widely before it was introduced to Parliament?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Okay.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
So, minister, you have seen it, but your official has not.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
I will bring in Pam Duncan-Glancy.
10:15Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
But do you accept that you are not answering those challenges? You have told the committee that the consultation closed less than a month ago, so you do not have that information for us. I accept that, but you could have had that information. Was there a blockage? Was there something that meant that you, as the minister, knowing what you were putting in the bill before it was introduced to Parliament, could not have consulted? Was there a legal problem? Was there a problem with officials?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
But that explanation was, “We’re not going to change it”.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
You are at the committee today saying that you are not sure where COSLA’s concerns stem from, but those concerns have been in black and white, in writing, for months. Why are you now saying that you will go away and speak to COSLA, given that you and your officials saw what it had said in its written submission on the bill?