The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1355 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Liz Smith
Have you communicated that problem to members?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Liz Smith
Like the rest of my colleagues, I have constituents who are very concerned about it. As Mr Marra said, they feel that people’s decisions about their future and their families have virtually had to be put on hold, with the very considerable anxiety that comes with that.
One particular constituent is asking me what you have done in the SPPA about your governance issues. Have you gone through your governance addressing whether the SPPA is an efficient body that is capable of sorting out the problems that we are hearing about this morning?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Liz Smith
Tell me what you have done.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Liz Smith
What you really have to build is trust with the many people who feel very badly let down. That is the critical thing.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Liz Smith
Yes, it is for the public inquiry to do that. I do not think that it is right for us to discuss the details. However, it has been put to us by a number of our witnesses that there is a public perception that is tied to the question that the convener asked about public trust. One of the reasons that public trust has been eroded is that too many people think that the delivery of public services is not meeting their needs and, more importantly, not meeting their desired expectations. Does the Scottish Government have a view on whether that is something that concerns it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Liz Smith
First, I want to put on the record my involvement with the Eljamel inquiry—particularly this week, when there are two public inquiry sessions. I have submitted my formal statement to the inquiry.
Does the Scottish Government have a view on the complaint that the committee has received in evidence that one of the reasons for the increase in the demand for public inquiries is the perception that the Scottish Government or its agencies have failed, or allegedly failed, in their duty to sort out a problem before it became the subject of a public inquiry?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Liz Smith
On the same theme, how would you respond to the complaints of the victims of the Eljamel situation who—without going into the details of the case—are firm in their view, which I share, that the need for a public inquiry would not have come about had we resolved the issues to do with Professor Eljamel’s malpractice? That malpractice was allowed to continue by a health board that clearly knew about it at the time. Do you accept that that is a fair comment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Liz Smith
That is helpful. I am sure that further revelations will come forth in the public inquiry.
I want to ask about a technical issue. The UK Inquiries Act 2005 governs what happens in a Scottish public inquiry. However, we have had a bit of an issue with the terms of reference for the Eljamel inquiry, because two of the contributing pieces of evidence must come from the Health and Safety Executive and the General Medical Council, both of which are reserved bodies. That is an issue, because the Inquiries (Scotland) Rules 2007 and the UK Inquiries Act 2005 do not necessarily collaborate, as it were, on that kind of thing.
In any review that takes place of public inquiries legislation, do you think that it is important for the UK and Scottish Governments to collaborate to ensure that reserved and devolved legislation enables specific questions to be answered and allows evidence to be taken from another jurisdiction?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Liz Smith
I am sure that he will.
Finally, does the Government have any intention to review the 2005 legislation? In the 20-year period since it was passed, we have seen a considerable increase in the number of public inquiries, and it has given rise to some of the important issues that we are discussing as a committee.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Liz Smith
Yes, I do, and I think that the evidence shows that. Mr Briggs referred earlier to his local authority, where it is quite clear that substantial numbers of teachers want to participate. I am also aware that teachers in our schools are facing increasing pressures for lots of different reasons, which we will probably debate in the chamber this afternoon.
We have to be mindful that there may be a time when we have to look at the situation again. However, as things stand, I am convinced, through the evidence, that not only are lots of teachers participating now, but they are seeing the great value of residential outdoor education in addressing some of the problems that are affecting schools at this moment. Therefore, yes, I am comfortable about that.
On amendments 29 and 30, I think that Pam Duncan-Glancy is absolutely right that it is essential—as the minister has also said—to continue to consult the trade unions. The minister asked whether I would make a commitment on that. Yes, I will, because I think that it is essential. I am very happy with those two amendments.