The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2405 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
In the submission from Colleges Scotland on the budget, which I am sure you have seen and which Jamie Greene mentioned earlier, there was a paragraph at the start about the reduction in funding. It says:
“The Scottish Funding Council ... has also recently set out the stark reality of the impact of this continued reduction in funding in a report which concluded ‘most colleges are not sustainable’ under current funding assumptions, and there is ‘an imminent risk of some colleges becoming insolvent by the end of 2025-26’.”
Do you agree with that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
We know that the number of people receiving the benefit will go up. Edel Harris tells us that, and the Scottish Fiscal Commission also predicts that costs will rise quite significantly over the years.
I will go back to one of the recommendations in the report, which is that the Government should
“set out how the ... financial gap”—
because there is one—
“will be managed over the medium term, including analysis of how this will impact on wider outcomes for disabled people.”
Do you accept that recommendation?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Following on from what Joe FitzPatrick asked about courses, do we have any analysis of which courses have been cut so far? Colleges are vital for providing the skills that Scotland needs. Are we at risk of reducing the impact that colleges can make?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Thank you; you made a very good go of that. However, the upshot is that things can change but there is still a funding gap. Even you seem to accept that, with your plethora of figures. I am not asking you to come back in at this point.
There is still a funding gap and the Auditor General is very clear that the Scottish Government does not have a detailed strategy for how it will manage that funding gap, whatever the figure is. Do you accept that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Can somebody help me out here? Does the application process for this benefit ever involve a face-to-face interview?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Whether you call it an “interview” or a “consultation”, it is a conversation. What are the criteria for asking someone to come in?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. Basically, there is a demand and there are not places to meet it, so I suppose that my point stands and things could just get worse.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
In the interests of time, I will leave it there.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Do you accept that recommendation?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
There we are. We have got somewhere. You have accepted a recommendation. Mr Kerr accepted the recommendation that there should be annual reports. That is progress.