Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 14 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2653 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”, and “Financial sustainability and taxes”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Graham Simpson

I did not want to dwell on this subject, because there are loads of other things that we could ask about, but I am not getting the assurance that, if the yard comes to the Government in another six months’ time and says, “Sorry, lads, we need another £15 million,” you are going to turn around and say no. You will say, “Okay, here, have it—but finish the vessel.”

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”, and “Financial sustainability and taxes”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Graham Simpson

I have one more thing that I want to ask about: agency staff. A specific case was identified of a previous employee who was engaged for four months on a part-time basis through an agency at a cost of £85,612. That was then subject to further direct awards; the appointment was extended to 10 months, with the total cost ending up at £220,689. It was a technical role, related to the closure of the European structural and investment funds; apparently, a value for money case was made, but that is an extraordinary sum for taking on somebody from an agency. How can we be assured that this kind of thing is not going to happen again and that those kinds of figures are not going to be spent?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”, and “Financial sustainability and taxes”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Graham Simpson

Okay. I will leave it there, convener.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”, and “Financial sustainability and taxes”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Graham Simpson

Have you improved the way in which you monitor such organisations, bearing in mind that the practices were uncovered not by you but by the Auditor General, in two reports? That is the fact of the matter.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”, and “Financial sustainability and taxes”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Graham Simpson

I will not dwell on that, because there is a lot more to get through.

I want to turn to the issue of Ferguson Marine. It might be for Mr Irwin to answer these questions, but that is up to the permanent secretary.

We have just learned that the cost of the Glen Rosa has risen again, by £12.5 million. That brings the total for completing that vessel alone to £197.5 million. It is fair to say that the Scottish Government has completely failed to keep a grip on costs. It has been the ultimate blank cheque. We keep on being told that ministers have made it clear that there are to be no more increases. Yesterday, Kate Forbes said that she was “disappointed”. It is all very well being disappointed, but where does the buck stop? Does the Government have a cut-off point beyond which no more money will be provided?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”, and “Financial sustainability and taxes”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Graham Simpson

That figure of £197.5 million is way past value for money. It is not value for money. My question is: how much more is the Government prepared to put into this? It seems to me that anything the yard asks for, it gets.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”, and “Financial sustainability and taxes”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Graham Simpson

You have not really answered the question. There is a gap.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”, and “Financial sustainability and taxes”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Graham Simpson

I get that it is a ministerial decision, but I am asking you whether there is a plan to close the gap.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”, and “Financial sustainability and taxes”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Graham Simpson

That is a no.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of Historic Environment Scotland”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Graham Simpson

There is a lot to pick up on. Has the number of cards reduced from 400?