Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 19 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3346 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Graham Simpson

So WICS has a role. It will say yes—

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Graham Simpson

Okay. Thanks.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Graham Simpson

The international work has been controversial and its associated spending has sparked controversy, but it earned quite a lot of money. Correct me if I am wrong, but the figure was about £1 million a year. What was that money used for?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Graham Simpson

Thank you. I will leave it there, convener.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Graham Simpson

Just to be clear, if I am picking you up right, you are talking about reducing the number of people at director level and potentially changing roles, so you may be asking people to apply for new roles that do not exist now.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Graham Simpson

Well, some roles will not exist. Can I put it that way?

Meeting of the Parliament

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Graham Simpson

If the minister thinks that this is an acceptable situation, I ask him to rethink, because some of the bonuses are, as unions have described them this week, “obscene”.

Yesterday, The Herald revealed that the bonuses of three Scottish Water executives amounted to £330,000 in 2023-24, and that £70,000 went to Alex Plant, the chief executive, as a “relocation handout”. We now have a situation in which water bills are going to rise by an inflation-busting amount of almost 10 per cent across the country, and workers are in dispute with Scottish Water. Does the minister not see that it is completely wrong to hand executives massive bonuses while squeezing the pay of ordinary Scottish Water workers?

Meeting of the Parliament

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Graham Simpson

To ask the Scottish Government for what reason Scottish Water continues to pay bonuses to its executives, when public sector pay policy reportedly prohibits this. (S6T-02350)

Meeting of the Parliament

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Graham Simpson

I do not think that the minister gets it. When the public see big awards of cash being made to public sector executives, as in this case—we have seen that before, have we not? At Ferguson Marine, executives were handed massive amounts of money and there was, quite rightly, a big hoo-hah about that.

The same concerns apply here. Scottish Water is publicly owned by all of us, and we should not be giving massive amounts of money to executives. Only three of them are getting that money. The minister ought to reflect on the situation, particularly at a time when Scottish Water staff are in dispute. He needs to think about how that looks. Again, I ask the minister to rethink.

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Graham Simpson

The minister knows that I think that the £2 bus fare should be a national thing and that there is no need for a pilot. However, if we are to have one, clearly the best place for it is where most people live—the Strathclyde region. That is where it should be. What does the minister need to have happen? Does he need to have a formal bid from Strathclyde Partnership for Transport in order for Strathclyde to win that pilot?