Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 24 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2716 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

First Minister’s Question Time

Meeting date: 20 June 2024

Graham Simpson

So it is “hopelessly ideological and anti-science”.

Wind energy is available only 45 per cent of the time and it requires back-up from gas. In comparison, nuclear is available 90 per cent of the time and is therefore far more reliable. The First Minister’s anti-nuclear energy stance has seen gas consumption double since 2015, so we have to assume that he wants to follow the example of Germany, Austria and Belgium, whose carbon emissions have risen after the decommissioning of nuclear plants.

Last week, the GMB congress called for the Scottish Government to lift the ban. It has now invited Kate Forbes to meet nuclear workers at Hunterston. Will she go?

Meeting of the Parliament

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Statistics 2022

Meeting date: 19 June 2024

Graham Simpson

In 2012. When exactly are we going to see that? How can we have any confidence at all that this Government will hit the new 2045 target when it has failed so miserably?

Meeting of the Parliament

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Statistics 2022

Meeting date: 19 June 2024

Graham Simpson

I thank the cabinet secretary for giving us plenty of advance notice of what she was going to say today, but what an embarrassment this is for this Government. The cabinet secretary has tried to put a positive spin on this, but it is fooling no one. The Government has failed yet again to meet its greenhouse gas emissions targets, and SNP ministers have now missed nine of the past 13 annual targets for tackling climate change. That is shocking. You can see why they want to do away with such inconveniences.

The cabinet secretary obviously has a sense of humour. She mentions trying to find new routes to the summit, but she is not even in the foothills. If she thinks that the Circular Economy (Scotland) Bill is going to make any difference, she has not been following its progress. She has a cheek to mention woodlands when the budget for woodland planting has been cut. Domestic transport is the largest source of greenhouse gas, and emissions have gone up.

Let us have a look at some of the things that she mentions in the statement. First, there is a new route map for EV chargers. The Climate Change Committee has suggested that we need 280,000 of those across the UK by 2030, which would amount to roughly 30,000 in Scotland—not 24,000. When are we going to see that route map?

She has a cheek to mention an integrated ticketing system, which was first promised in 2012.

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 19 June 2024

Graham Simpson

To ask the Scottish Government when it plans to deliver on its commitment to produce a national register of ancient woodland. (S6O-03596)

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 19 June 2024

Graham Simpson

I thank the cabinet secretary for her answer, but she did not say when the Government plans to deliver that register. I accept that there have been talks and consultations, but if we are to be able to protect and restore our ancient woodland, we need to know where it is, how much of it there is and what condition it is in. I urge the cabinet secretary to have another go at the original question and to tell me when we will see a national register.

Meeting of the Parliament

Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 12 June 2024

Graham Simpson

I know that my intervention comes as a surprise, but I am listening with interest to Mr Balfour. I speak as a former convener of the DPLR Committee, so this is a little bit technical.

Mr Balfour has described the affirmative procedure as possibly improper. It is not improper; it is proper—it is just that the super-affirmative procedure is better and more rigorous. I think that that is the argument that he is trying to make. Does he agree with me on that?

Public Audit Committee

Expiring Private Finance Initiative Contracts

Meeting date: 6 June 2024

Graham Simpson

How many staff have agreed to do that?

Public Audit Committee

Expiring Private Finance Initiative Contracts

Meeting date: 6 June 2024

Graham Simpson

Would it be fair to say that the Serco staff were more generalist and that your staff are more specialist?

Public Audit Committee

Expiring Private Finance Initiative Contracts

Meeting date: 6 June 2024

Graham Simpson

You are having to take on more staff.

Public Audit Committee

Expiring Private Finance Initiative Contracts

Meeting date: 6 June 2024

Graham Simpson

In relation to the A9, which is the only project that I am aware of for which that approach has been suggested, although there might be others, it struck me that what is actually happening is that you are getting the private sector to fund part of the road and then getting the public sector—that is, the Scottish Government—to pay the private funder so much every year for the use of the road. You could call it a rent-a-road scheme. However, what happens at the end of that? Is there is still a final payment.