The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2215 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
My thoughts are that, if we accept that there is a two-step process for constituency members—we might not—then we should be consistent and have a similar process for regional members. If we were to change to a one-step process for regional members—in which case we would not have the 10 per cent threshold; we would just do away with that—we would have only one vote on whether that person should stay or go. If we did that, however, why would we not have a one-step process for a constituency member and go straight to a by-election?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I accept that. The question is fair, but it throws up other questions. All that I am saying is that to go down that route throws up other questions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I think that it is enough that somebody is incarcerated.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I think that somebody would have to be in jail.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
No.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I know. I really do not think that the threat of a fearsome whip is enough, to be honest. Actual hard-and-fast rules need to be set down, otherwise the scenario that I have set out is possible. What if somebody just decided to ignore you, Ms Mackay?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It is an area that should be looked at further, but it should be left to regulations.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I do not think that it would be strong enough. The code of conduct can be easily changed, so anything that you did now could be changed later.
My starting point was the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973, which applies to councillors and which I mentioned earlier. It seemed to me that, if we have a law that requires a certain level of attendance by councillors, we really ought to have the same for MSPs. However, as you know, there is currently nothing in that regard.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
No, I do not think so. The provision aims to capture people—I am not going to name names—who have just decided that they are not going to come in. It has happened in councils and it will happen here. I hope that it is a rare event, but people are people—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
The parliamentary authorities would have to come up with a system for monitoring attendance. I am not going to lay that out in detail—I do not think that that would be right. This committee would certainly have a role if somebody was falling foul of the requirement to attend, and we have to trust the members of this committee to keep issues private, as they do—I think that this committee works very well.
In previous meetings, the issue arose of whether, in such cases, this committee should have lay members, so that decisions could be de-politicised. The bill does not address that, but it is perhaps something that should be considered.