Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 22 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2716 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

“National Fraud Initiative in Scotland 2024”

Meeting date: 26 September 2024

Graham Simpson

Do you not have a total cost for the exercise?

Public Audit Committee

“National Fraud Initiative in Scotland 2024”

Meeting date: 26 September 2024

Graham Simpson

Has anyone pushed the Home Office on this?

Public Audit Committee

“National Fraud Initiative in Scotland 2024”

Meeting date: 26 September 2024

Graham Simpson

You have not?

Public Audit Committee

“National Fraud Initiative in Scotland 2024”

Meeting date: 26 September 2024

Graham Simpson

Okay. I will ask you about something else—the council tax reduction scheme. Before I ask you a specific question about that, do councils generally share information? Do they talk to each other? In Scotland, we now have a large number of councils that charge double council tax on a second home. That relies on people being honest about having a second home. It seems to me that it would be easier to discover that from councils speaking to one another—actually, across the UK. Does that happen?

Public Audit Committee

“National Fraud Initiative in Scotland 2024”

Meeting date: 26 September 2024

Graham Simpson

It has always gone on—there have always been people who use blue badges when they really ought not to. Do the figures suggest that it is rather too easy to get away with that?

Public Audit Committee

“National Fraud Initiative in Scotland 2024”

Meeting date: 26 September 2024

Graham Simpson

That brings me to adult concessionary bus travel, which has the same issue. You are right that, when somebody dies, people have a lot to deal with, and dealing with a blue badge or a bus pass is probably quite far down their list of priorities. However, the report says that 1,075 bus passes have been used after somebody died. That means that someone is using a dead person’s bus pass. That is not the same as just forgetting to tell somebody.

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 26 September 2024

Graham Simpson

A Transport Focus survey shows that satisfaction with the frequency of ScotRail trains is in the bottom half of levels across the United Kingdom. I hope that that will improve. The cabinet secretary says that she wants the timetable to be reinstated “as soon as possible”. What does she mean by that? Can she be more specific?

Meeting of the Parliament

Business Motions

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Graham Simpson

Moving an amendment to the business motion is not something that I do lightly, but I do so because I passionately believe in Parliament giving its members ample time to scrutinise legislation. We should all know that rushed legislation can be bad legislation.

First, let me say what the minister’s business motion seeks to do. It seeks to set a timetable for dealing with the Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Bill. In trying to amend the business motion, I am interested only in that timetable; I am not interested in the bill itself, save to say that it is an important piece of legislation.

The minister wants us to have the following timetable. Stage 1 would be on Thursday 10 October. Should the bill pass that hurdle, stage 2 would be completed by Tuesday 29 October. Members will immediately realise that that takes in our two-week October recess. That is an issue that we should seek to avoid, but we can probably live with it.

With stage 2 having been completed by 29 October, the minister then wants stage 3 to be done and dusted on 31 October. That gives members and officials just two days to turn around amendments to a bill in which there is a great deal of interest. Parliament can act at pace, and it has done so on occasion in emergencies, but the only reason why we are being asked to do so on this occasion is to spare the Government’s blushes. That is because, under the law as it stands, which the bill seeks to amend, the Government has to produce a draft climate change plan by the end of November, and it is nowhere near doing that. That is the Government’s problem, which, quite frankly, is the Government’s fault. Parliament is not here to spare the Government’s blushes or to get it out of a hole. We are here to do our jobs properly.

The Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee has been very careful not to express a view on timetabling, but it has written about

“the importance of there being adequate time between stages 2 and 3 for the implications of any stage 2 amendment agreed in committee being carefully considered.”

Meeting of the Parliament

Business Motions

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Graham Simpson

I am very pleased to hear that. Mr Whitfield is absolutely right, because in no one’s world—not even the minister’s, if he is honest about it—is two days enough. My amendment, if it is agreed to, would set the stage 3 date as 7 November. That is a week more than what the minister is proposing, and even that is probably too short.

The minister should see what I am proposing as a sensible compromise. Parliament needs to be able to do its job properly. Scrutiny is an essential part of our work here, but we need to have the time to do it. MSPs have a simple choice between the minister’s rushed two-day deadline and my nine-day one. It is quite obvious which is the better, and it is not the minister’s.

I move amendment S6M-14652.1, to leave out “31 October” and insert “7 November”.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 Audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 19 September 2024

Graham Simpson

Okay, and you do not think that the former CEO was guilty of gross misconduct. Did he do anything wrong that would have merited his leaving the organisation?