The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3346 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Graham Simpson
In September last year, the Scottish Government published a report on RAAC in the public sector, which said that, in the NHS estate, it was likely that the number of buildings containing RAAC had fluctuated from 395 initially to 560. Today, we were told that 50 buildings definitely have it. Is that number likely to go up? Can the minister explain why he did not mention the Police Scotland estate, the courts estate, the Scottish Water estate, colleges or prisons in his statement?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Graham Simpson
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on what actions it is taking to end the housing emergency. (S6O-04734)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Graham Simpson
I thank the minister for that answer, but I cannot help thinking that there is no housing emergency plan after that. Following last week’s statement, I mentioned the issue of sites not being able to progress because they cannot get grid connections, and I want to quickly raise a couple of other issues. It can take as long as two years for developers to get permissions, and there can be up-front costs amounting to hundreds of thousands of pounds before any work can be done. What is the minister doing to unlock development by speeding up the system and making the process cheaper?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
I want to follow on from the convener’s line of questioning. I do not know whether you are a fan of the TV programme “Dragon’s Den”, but I am. One of the questions that the investors often ask is, “How will I get a return on my money if I invest in you?” They are thinking of an exit strategy. Does the investment bank ask that kind of question when it is making these investments? Ultimately, it needs to get a return.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
Maybe we will get a chance to ask it.
You mentioned in the report—and I think that it has come up already in the questioning—the business of staff getting bonuses, which is not normal in the public sector, as you recognise. Given the nature of the business—let us call it that, because it is a bank—is it appropriate that bonuses are paid when they are generally not paid elsewhere in the public sector?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
I am thinking out loud here. You have said that it is too early to say whether many of those investments will pay off. Why are we paying bonuses if it is too early to say whether various investments have paid off?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
This is my final question. You mention in the report the gender pay gap—the gap between what men and women are paid. That is an issue in the financial services industry and it is an issue in the bank. Is it a problem, and what is the bank doing to address it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
As we have discussed, there are inherent risks when investing—if there is investment in companies that are deemed to be high risk, there will be winners and losers. Probably the biggest loser among SNIB’s investments so far was its investment in Circularity Scotland. You have said repeatedly that the bank sees itself as independent and that it does not like political interference—it would say that there is no political interference—but Circularity Scotland was set up in the wake of Government proposals for a deposit return scheme, so could there at least be the perception that there was an element of politics in the decision to invest a lot of money in Circularity Scotland?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
But when it makes that investment, has it got an exit strategy? If you put in, say, £10 million, A, you are not going to want to lose that money and, B, you will want to make a profit. Do you think that it has such a plan for its various investments?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
I was a member of the Economy and Fair Work Committee when we looked at the matter in June 2023. I put it to Willie Watt, the chair of the board, that the bank had demonstrated a lack of due diligence and had not thought things through. He told me:
“Sometimes people make mistakes, sometimes people get things wrong, and sometimes the facts turn out to be different from what we thought they would be.”
He also said that the bank
“will make losses on investments”.—[Official Report, Economy and Fair Work Committee, 21 June 2023; c 7.]
Well, we know that. Has the bank learned any lessons from that calamitous investment?