The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2599 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
You mentioned some things in your report that may help with the problem, and you provided some case studies. One case study is the discharge without delay programme, which I guess is what we have been talking about. That is when somebody comes into hospital and we try to get them out of hospital into an appropriate setting. Discharge without delay is described in your report as a collaborative that meets fortnightly, that has over 50 members and that covers 11 health boards across Scotland. How successful has it been?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
I will start on the money. Why is it that the cost of delayed discharges is not known?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
The figures in the appendix that you reference are a bit all over the place, and there is no set pattern to them. People can look at it for themselves. I am keen to explore the reasons for delayed discharges. In exhibit 2, you have helpfully set out some of them. There is no one leading reason. It could be due to waiting for a care home place, for availability at a high-level specialist facility, for a care package at home or for adaptations to be made in the patient’s home. There are all kinds of reasons.
11:15
However, I was struck by these words in paragraph 67:
“If a person is admitted to a hospital, the discharge planning process should start immediately”.
That is my thinking, because, as you have highlighted, most people who are affected by delayed discharges are aged over 75, so if somebody of that age is going into hospital, it should not be too difficult to figure out that they might need a package of care in order to leave. I would have thought—and you say—that the planning should start as soon as they get into hospital.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
Your report also mentioned the hospital at home model. There is a commitment to increase the number of hospital at home beds to at least 2,000 by December. Are we on track to achieve that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
My reading of the situation is that it is more likely that we will not get there by 2030.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
Okay. There are a couple of letters that you have sent in that I want to ask about. First, there is the letter that you sent to the Auditor General on 4 September last year. There were some comments in there directed at the Auditor General and we have not really seen comments like that directed at the Auditor General before. Have you got the letter?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
Okay. If we look at what actually appeared in the final draft, we see the Auditor General saying that
“the Scottish Government and COSLA, with support from The Promise Scotland, should … work together to identify where resources need to be targeted to deliver The Promise”.
That is basically the same thing, in different words.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
It is just that you used the phrase:
“the report could derail … progress”.
The report is essentially an analysis of where we are, how the Promise is going and whether we are on track. It is far more detailed than that, but, in summary, that is what it is and that is what the Auditor General does. That process in itself is hardly going to derail anything, is it? It is surely more of a help than a hindrance.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
Okay. There is a section in your letter, on the second page, about the clearance draft, which you were sent. It says:
“As it stands, the lead recommendation in the clearance draft creates a significant and entirely unnecessary risk to children, families and care experienced adults.”
Can you explain why you said that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
Well, it is about carrying out an appraisal. An appraisal is about seeing where you are, essentially, and that is what the Auditor General is saying there. I fail to see how doing that piece of work, however you word it, can put children, families and care-experienced adults at risk. Surely, it is something that you should be doing on an on-going basis.