Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 19 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2699 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Graham Simpson

Mr Marks, you will be very pleased to know that I will not ask you about the purchase of any books this year.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Graham Simpson

I am talking about the employee who set up the limited company, not Mr Tydeman.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Graham Simpson

After Mr Tydeman had left.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Graham Simpson

I am sorry but, on that point, is that why the employment was terminated?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Graham Simpson

His sacking was for different reasons.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Graham Simpson

Okay. I will move on, because we are really short of time.

I would like you to provide an update on Prestwick airport. The value of the airport seems to have increased. According to the consolidated accounts, it has gone up from £11.6 million to £21.2 million, but the airport has still not been sold. Despite the Government saying that it wants to sell it, and the various expressions of interest over the years, it remains in public hands. However, when we look around, we see other airports in the private sector in Scotland that have been sold. Why has Prestwick airport not been sold? What is the update?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Graham Simpson

Well, you are not doing that.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Graham Simpson

That is a yes.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Graham Simpson

In the Auditor General’s report, there is a section on Social Security Scotland that mentions the level of potential fraud. I use the word “potential” because we cannot be certain about the amounts. The Auditor General says:

“The estimated overpayments as a result of fraud and error in the benefits delivered by the DWP”—

that is, on behalf of Social Security Scotland—

“range from 0.4 to 5.2 per cent of expenditure. This means an estimated £42.4 million of overpayments were made in Scotland.”

Thankfully, that is down from £60.7 million of overpayments the previous year, but it is still a huge amount, if it is in any way accurate.

First of all, do you accept those figures? If you do, what are we doing about them? I accept that the benefits are being delivered by the Department for Work and Pensions, but those are enormous sums. What are we doing to get those sums down? Can we expect to go on having that level of fraud?

Meeting of the Parliament

Electricity Infrastructure Consenting

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Graham Simpson

I apologise, but I will not be taking any interventions.

Many of the projects in Scotland sit with the Scottish Government’s shadowy energy consents unit, which is taking the decisions, rather than with local councils, as is the case in England.

Once NESO has shaken things out, we will need clarity from the ECU and from the Government on the criteria for agreeing to or not agreeing to developments. For example, some of the potential developments in my region are in green-belt land. What is the ECU’s stance on that? We simply do not know. We need a transparent process for involving people and showing what community benefit will look like. I hope that the Scottish Government will publish its conclusions on that soon.

The current top-down approach must end. People have a right to be involved in the decision-making process and to have their concerns addressed. We need a Scotland-wide energy strategy that sets out how many projects are required and where they are needed. That would be a positive outcome of the reforms that are to come. Battery storage will be needed, but we must use the pause that is now in place to get it right.

16:30