The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2699 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Mr Marks, you will be very pleased to know that I will not ask you about the purchase of any books this year.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
I am talking about the employee who set up the limited company, not Mr Tydeman.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
After Mr Tydeman had left.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
I am sorry but, on that point, is that why the employment was terminated?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
His sacking was for different reasons.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. I will move on, because we are really short of time.
I would like you to provide an update on Prestwick airport. The value of the airport seems to have increased. According to the consolidated accounts, it has gone up from £11.6 million to £21.2 million, but the airport has still not been sold. Despite the Government saying that it wants to sell it, and the various expressions of interest over the years, it remains in public hands. However, when we look around, we see other airports in the private sector in Scotland that have been sold. Why has Prestwick airport not been sold? What is the update?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Well, you are not doing that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
That is a yes.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
In the Auditor General’s report, there is a section on Social Security Scotland that mentions the level of potential fraud. I use the word “potential” because we cannot be certain about the amounts. The Auditor General says:
“The estimated overpayments as a result of fraud and error in the benefits delivered by the DWP”—
that is, on behalf of Social Security Scotland—
“range from 0.4 to 5.2 per cent of expenditure. This means an estimated £42.4 million of overpayments were made in Scotland.”
Thankfully, that is down from £60.7 million of overpayments the previous year, but it is still a huge amount, if it is in any way accurate.
First of all, do you accept those figures? If you do, what are we doing about them? I accept that the benefits are being delivered by the Department for Work and Pensions, but those are enormous sums. What are we doing to get those sums down? Can we expect to go on having that level of fraud?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
I apologise, but I will not be taking any interventions.
Many of the projects in Scotland sit with the Scottish Government’s shadowy energy consents unit, which is taking the decisions, rather than with local councils, as is the case in England.
Once NESO has shaken things out, we will need clarity from the ECU and from the Government on the criteria for agreeing to or not agreeing to developments. For example, some of the potential developments in my region are in green-belt land. What is the ECU’s stance on that? We simply do not know. We need a transparent process for involving people and showing what community benefit will look like. I hope that the Scottish Government will publish its conclusions on that soon.
The current top-down approach must end. People have a right to be involved in the decision-making process and to have their concerns addressed. We need a Scotland-wide energy strategy that sets out how many projects are required and where they are needed. That would be a positive outcome of the reforms that are to come. Battery storage will be needed, but we must use the pause that is now in place to get it right.
16:30