The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3346 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Graham Simpson
Auditor General, will you explain in layman’s terms why the situation matters?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Graham Simpson
Clearly, there is a physical thing—a building—which will be worth something.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Graham Simpson
It will not be £1.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Graham Simpson
There are two different things going on here. There is the money that a building can generate and the actual value of the building, and they are two separate things.
You mentioned getting in a professional valuer to give a figure for the building. Is the solution not just to bring in a valuer, get them to value the building, then agree on a figure?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Graham Simpson
Has that been suggested to the college?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Graham Simpson
I think that we can see a solution here. If the college is sensible, we can resolve this. I will leave it there, convener.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Graham Simpson
What assets are we talking about? There is a building, is there not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Graham Simpson
I have to say that I struggle to see how you could possibly say that a building of that nature was worth £1. What is the evidence that brings the auditors to the conclusion that the share is £4.7 million?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Graham Simpson
I welcome the cabinet secretary to her position. We have had a couple of very useful discussions over the summer, and I am pleased that she agrees with me on rent controls exemptions.
The cabinet secretary also agrees with me on the need to bring into force Awaab’s law to deal with damp and mould in all rented homes. Will she work with me on a possible amendment to the Housing (Scotland) Bill on that issue at stage 3, and will she tell us what enforcement mechanisms she foresees being introduced to ensure that landlords comply?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Graham Simpson
That is very nice of Patrick to say. He is right. We have worked together on the issue for a long time. There has been cross-party agreement on the subject, and I was very happy to sign his motion when it appeared. I am really glad that we are having this debate.
Clare Haughey expressed the frustration that many of us have felt over the years when bus services have been removed. I live in an area of East Kilbride from which a bus service was removed some years ago. The service has not returned to what it was. I would describe the area that I live in as a bus desert, so it is no wonder that most people—including me—use cars, even though we would much rather be able to use public transport.
That is why there are many of us in Parliament who favour a move to a franchising model in the Strathclyde region. One of the frustrations, though, is the time that that is taking—it is taking far too long. The powers were introduced in the Transport (Scotland) Act 2019, but the regulations have only just gone through, and it will be some years before a franchising model—if, indeed, the proposal goes ahead—is rolled out across Strathclyde.
When I say “across Strathclyde”, I am talking about not just Glasgow but all the places around it, such as East Kilbride, North Lanarkshire, South Lanarkshire and the Renfrewshires. Those should all be part of an integrated transport system for Strathclyde.
I am less hung up about who owns the buses than Patrick Harvie might be, but they need to operate under one badge, with one body—probably SPT—running them, setting fares and organising the routes, and perhaps also running a light rail system. Maybe we will, at some point, get the Clyde metro system that we have been promised. Maybe it will even happen in my lifetime—I hope so. In essence, we need a better public transport system, and that is why people want franchising in Strathclyde.
The minister, who will respond to the debate, has written to the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee. However, in that letter, he does not seem to accept that things are taking too long and that there are problems, such as the problem with the panel appeal process that Patrick Harvie raised earlier. That really needs to change, and I look forward to speaking to the minister very soon—next week, in fact, when I hope that we can iron out some of those problems.
Once again, Deputy Presiding Officer, I really do apologise for not being in the chamber in person. I prefer to do these things in person, but I am glad that we have had the debate.