Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 23 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3346 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Care Home Visiting Rights (Anne’s Law)

Meeting date: 9 March 2022

Graham Simpson

I had a heartbreaking case in East Kilbride. The family contacted me and described visiting their mother in a care home just up the road as being like a prison visit. Does Dr Gulhane agree that we need to move on from a situation like that?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Graham Simpson

Hello again, Mr Swinney.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Graham Simpson

Like who? Who would be unwilling? You have relied on guidance.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Graham Simpson

I might well do that, in order to help you out. I will leave it there.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Graham Simpson

Move on, convener.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Graham Simpson

I would not expect you to do that. I am trying to get to a point where we move on from our report and your response. The committee said that, when you use the made affirmative procedure, there should be a statement as to why you believe that the matter is urgent. In your response, you say:

“My view is that the Scottish Government already provides a clear explanation of its rationale for urgency”.

However, you go on to say that you are

“happy to work with the Committee to consider how that could be better codified in practice”.

I am keen to find out how we can work together to get to a point at which you provide something that is, in my view, better than what you do at the moment, and we have a proper explanation of why something is urgent.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Graham Simpson

In my final question, I will go back to what I asked you about last week—the regulations to close school boarding and student accommodation. Last week, we spoke about your desire for that power to last for an extra six months, even though the Government has never used it. Now you want to have that power permanently. How do you justify having that power permanently when it has never been used or needed?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Graham Simpson

Having gone through the letter that the committee received from you yesterday, it seems to me that its general tone, and your view, appears to be that the Scottish Government is not doing much wrong in respect of the made affirmative procedure. Considering the committee’s report and the debate that we had in the chamber, I was—I will be honest—disappointed when I read the letter, as you do not seem to accept much of what the committee said. If you think that I have got that wrong, please say so.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Graham Simpson

It can indeed, but it covers such a wide area. The Education, Children and Young People Committee has already taken evidence that included a view that some of the education provisions may be unlawful. If the bill goes through, you run the risk of facing legal challenge. Even if it was just a narrow legal challenge relating to the education part, the whole thing could fall. From my point of view, I do not like the bill, full stop. From your point of view, you want to get it through, but the whole thing could fall because you have decided to lump it together and there might be a legal challenge.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 March 2022

Graham Simpson

We can maybe look at that.

A general question is that the bill covers a wide range of areas, from education, tenancy rights and justice to health matters. Why did you put all that in one bill and not split it up? Some things in the bill are quite far reaching. For example, on tenancy rights, you could argue that what is in the bill has nothing to do with public health and everything to do with tenancy rights and changing rental law in this country. Why not introduce a separate bill on that? Work is already going on in the area and consultations are out there. Why not do it in that way?