The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2564 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
It is all right to have hope, but there has to be realism, as well.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
Can you just read out that recommendation again, if you would?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
But you just read it out.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
I would argue that what actually appeared is very similar; it is just a different form of words. If you read the Auditor General’s reports on a variety of subjects, he often makes a very similar recommendation to organisations—to check on progress and report back within six or 12 months. That is what he has done here, so this is all quite normal. Do you not accept that your wording—“creates … unnecessary risk”—is a bit over the top? With the benefit of hindsight, do you accept that maybe you could have reworded that, as you asked the Auditor General to do?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
I am going to ask you about another sentence, which is near the end of the letter. You say:
“at worst, the report could derail Scotland’s progress towards keeping the promise.”
We asked about that in a previous evidence session on this matter. How can a report from the Auditor General
“derail Scotland’s progress towards keeping the promise”?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
The people involved with the Promise were not suddenly going to down tools and stop work after seeing the original draft, or even the final version.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Graham Simpson
We will have to agree to disagree on that, which is fine.
I will ask you about one more thing in the same letter. You say that you asked
“to get more involved in supporting the Audit Scotland team”,
and you accept that that
“is not the usual process”
which it is not. Were you trying to steer Audit Scotland at that point? Were you hoping that that was what greater involvement might lead to?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Graham Simpson
How long is the interim period?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Graham Simpson
Do you know how many tickets have been dished out over, say, a year?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Graham Simpson
I will press you on that. If somebody hires a venue, Historic Environment Scotland is entitled to a number of complimentary tickets. Do we know how many tickets it is contractually entitled to?