Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 29 January 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2564 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Graham Simpson

It is all right to have hope, but there has to be realism, as well.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Graham Simpson

Can you just read out that recommendation again, if you would?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Graham Simpson

But you just read it out.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Graham Simpson

I would argue that what actually appeared is very similar; it is just a different form of words. If you read the Auditor General’s reports on a variety of subjects, he often makes a very similar recommendation to organisations—to check on progress and report back within six or 12 months. That is what he has done here, so this is all quite normal. Do you not accept that your wording—“creates … unnecessary risk”—is a bit over the top? With the benefit of hindsight, do you accept that maybe you could have reworded that, as you asked the Auditor General to do?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Graham Simpson

I am going to ask you about another sentence, which is near the end of the letter. You say:

“at worst, the report could derail Scotland’s progress towards keeping the promise.”

We asked about that in a previous evidence session on this matter. How can a report from the Auditor General

“derail Scotland’s progress towards keeping the promise”?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Graham Simpson

The people involved with the Promise were not suddenly going to down tools and stop work after seeing the original draft, or even the final version.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 21 January 2026

Graham Simpson

We will have to agree to disagree on that, which is fine.

I will ask you about one more thing in the same letter. You say that you asked

“to get more involved in supporting the Audit Scotland team”,

and you accept that that

“is not the usual process”

which it is not. Were you trying to steer Audit Scotland at that point? Were you hoping that that was what greater involvement might lead to?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of Historic Environment Scotland”

Meeting date: 14 January 2026

Graham Simpson

How long is the interim period?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of Historic Environment Scotland”

Meeting date: 14 January 2026

Graham Simpson

Do you know how many tickets have been dished out over, say, a year?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of Historic Environment Scotland”

Meeting date: 14 January 2026

Graham Simpson

I will press you on that. If somebody hires a venue, Historic Environment Scotland is entitled to a number of complimentary tickets. Do we know how many tickets it is contractually entitled to?