Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 19 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2702 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Graham Simpson

Good. Well, we agree on that. I am going to finish by asking about the area that Colin Beattie was exploring, which is the fundamental question of why we need an economic regulator. I suppose this is a question for you, Mr Brannen and maybe Mr Hinds. If WICS did not exist, would we notice the difference?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Graham Simpson

Before Mr Hinds comes in, I put it to you that WICS is essentially regulating a Scottish Government body and WICS itself is a Scottish Government body. If we got rid of one level of regulation, Scottish Water could perhaps just report to you as the sponsorship team, and you could regulate it.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Graham Simpson

What do you think should happen to it?

Meeting of the Parliament

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Graham Simpson

If the minister thinks that this is an acceptable situation, I ask him to rethink, because some of the bonuses are, as unions have described them this week, “obscene”.

Yesterday, The Herald revealed that the bonuses of three Scottish Water executives amounted to £330,000 in 2023-24, and that £70,000 went to Alex Plant, the chief executive, as a “relocation handout”. We now have a situation in which water bills are going to rise by an inflation-busting amount of almost 10 per cent across the country, and workers are in dispute with Scottish Water. Does the minister not see that it is completely wrong to hand executives massive bonuses while squeezing the pay of ordinary Scottish Water workers?

Meeting of the Parliament

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Graham Simpson

To ask the Scottish Government for what reason Scottish Water continues to pay bonuses to its executives, when public sector pay policy reportedly prohibits this. (S6T-02350)

Meeting of the Parliament

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Graham Simpson

I do not think that the minister gets it. When the public see big awards of cash being made to public sector executives, as in this case—we have seen that before, have we not? At Ferguson Marine, executives were handed massive amounts of money and there was, quite rightly, a big hoo-hah about that.

The same concerns apply here. Scottish Water is publicly owned by all of us, and we should not be giving massive amounts of money to executives. Only three of them are getting that money. The minister ought to reflect on the situation, particularly at a time when Scottish Water staff are in dispute. He needs to think about how that looks. Again, I ask the minister to rethink.

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Graham Simpson

The minister knows that I think that the £2 bus fare should be a national thing and that there is no need for a pilot. However, if we are to have one, clearly the best place for it is where most people live—the Strathclyde region. That is where it should be. What does the minister need to have happen? Does he need to have a formal bid from Strathclyde Partnership for Transport in order for Strathclyde to win that pilot?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow (Holdings) Limited”

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Graham Simpson

One of the assumptions in the business plan is that the yard will remain in public ownership for five years. Is that realistic?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow (Holdings) Limited”

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Graham Simpson

But is five years realistic, in your view, or could the period be shorter?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow (Holdings) Limited”

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

Graham Simpson

Following one of our previous meetings, there was quite a lot of publicity about the exit packages paid to FMPG employees, each of which has been valued at above the £95,000 threshold set out in the Scottish public finance manual. There were three of those packages in 2023-24, two of which were paid without approval from the Scottish Government. The question for you, Mr Miller, as chair of the board, is this: how could that happen?