The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2702 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Graham Simpson
Good. Well, we agree on that. I am going to finish by asking about the area that Colin Beattie was exploring, which is the fundamental question of why we need an economic regulator. I suppose this is a question for you, Mr Brannen and maybe Mr Hinds. If WICS did not exist, would we notice the difference?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Graham Simpson
Before Mr Hinds comes in, I put it to you that WICS is essentially regulating a Scottish Government body and WICS itself is a Scottish Government body. If we got rid of one level of regulation, Scottish Water could perhaps just report to you as the sponsorship team, and you could regulate it.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Graham Simpson
What do you think should happen to it?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Graham Simpson
If the minister thinks that this is an acceptable situation, I ask him to rethink, because some of the bonuses are, as unions have described them this week, “obscene”.
Yesterday, The Herald revealed that the bonuses of three Scottish Water executives amounted to £330,000 in 2023-24, and that £70,000 went to Alex Plant, the chief executive, as a “relocation handout”. We now have a situation in which water bills are going to rise by an inflation-busting amount of almost 10 per cent across the country, and workers are in dispute with Scottish Water. Does the minister not see that it is completely wrong to hand executives massive bonuses while squeezing the pay of ordinary Scottish Water workers?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Graham Simpson
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason Scottish Water continues to pay bonuses to its executives, when public sector pay policy reportedly prohibits this. (S6T-02350)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Graham Simpson
I do not think that the minister gets it. When the public see big awards of cash being made to public sector executives, as in this case—we have seen that before, have we not? At Ferguson Marine, executives were handed massive amounts of money and there was, quite rightly, a big hoo-hah about that.
The same concerns apply here. Scottish Water is publicly owned by all of us, and we should not be giving massive amounts of money to executives. Only three of them are getting that money. The minister ought to reflect on the situation, particularly at a time when Scottish Water staff are in dispute. He needs to think about how that looks. Again, I ask the minister to rethink.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Graham Simpson
The minister knows that I think that the £2 bus fare should be a national thing and that there is no need for a pilot. However, if we are to have one, clearly the best place for it is where most people live—the Strathclyde region. That is where it should be. What does the minister need to have happen? Does he need to have a formal bid from Strathclyde Partnership for Transport in order for Strathclyde to win that pilot?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Graham Simpson
One of the assumptions in the business plan is that the yard will remain in public ownership for five years. Is that realistic?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Graham Simpson
But is five years realistic, in your view, or could the period be shorter?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Graham Simpson
Following one of our previous meetings, there was quite a lot of publicity about the exit packages paid to FMPG employees, each of which has been valued at above the £95,000 threshold set out in the Scottish public finance manual. There were three of those packages in 2023-24, two of which were paid without approval from the Scottish Government. The question for you, Mr Miller, as chair of the board, is this: how could that happen?