Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 21 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2704 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

You said that it is up to local councils to set out exemptions, and then you agreed with me that you could do it in regulations, which you can but you have chosen not to.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

We will come to that in the debate.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

I am aware of those three. You have just completely contradicted yourself—

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

The problem is that we do not have enough ferries and that those ferries that we have are too old and so keep breaking down. That lies at the door of CMAL. A report from a previous committee of this Parliament said that CMAL should be scrapped. When will the minister act on that?

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Made Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

I am making the point that I believe that this Parliament is up to the job of scrutinising any piece of legislation and that we can do so at pace. Given that we have a hybrid form of working now, people can do that from home. I would be prepared to work weekends, if that was necessary.

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Made Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

Stuart McMillan has a point, because hybrid working was not in place initially, so we might have struggled. However, it is now in place. He might not be able to say it, but I think that Stuart McMillan actually agrees with my point that we could act at pace.

Both the DPLR Committee and the COVID-19 Recovery Committee have said that the affirmative procedure should be the default. Therefore, I hope that the COVID-19 Recovery Committee will reject forthwith anything that is done otherwise, unless it is to get rid of restrictions.

Presiding Officer, too many committee reports are ignored by the Government. This report is for the Government, but it is also for Parliament. I hope that you and your colleagues will take a stand, because you are there to defend Parliament. We have been bypassed for the past two years and it has to stop.

15:55  

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Made Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

I think that I am in my last minute, but I will take an intervention if I am given time to do so.

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

Made Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

Would the Deputy First Minister accept that it is possible to have an expedited procedure, as was recommended in the report? Does he accept that Parliament can act at pace and does not need to take 40 days when we use an affirmative procedure, and that we could change things if we need to act quickly?

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

OVO Energy (Redundancies)

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

Murdo Fraser is right. That is utterly unacceptable.

I came across a quote from a spokesman for OVO, who said:

“Scotland is a great place for our business, which is why we are making it an operational centre of excellence and one of our three office locations.

We are opening a new OVO Academy in Glasgow ... While we are closing some of our offices, there is an opportunity for remote working. ... We are committed to investing in Scotland; creating higher skilled, better paid jobs in Scotland.”

If only I could believe that. I do not believe it, and OVO should think again.

 

17:59  

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)

OVO Energy (Redundancies)

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

I, too, thank Jim Fairlie for, and congratulate him on, bringing this debate to the chamber. It is really important for those of us who represent areas that are affected by the closures—the Cumbernauld office is one of the offices that could close, and Cumbernauld is in Central Scotland, which I represent.

I have spoken to OVO staff in Cumbernauld. They took something of a risk when they spoke to me, because they told me that they had been contacted by the company and told in rather threatening tones not to breathe a word about the matter to anyone. That is an appalling way to deal with people. Those people spoke to me on the basis that I would not reveal who they were—and, of course, I will not. However, that should never be the case, and that left a sour taste in my mouth.

We have already heard a bit of the history of OVO and SSE and about how we came to be where we are. I have no real confidence in people being told that there will be no compulsory redundancies—I simply do not believe that. When companies close offices and create hubs, people tend to go whether or not they want to. The Cumbernauld office is the nearest office to the so-called superhub in Glasgow. It might be said that that is the most convenient place, but it is not convenient for everyone. Not everyone can get to wherever that hub is. It does not suit some people who work part time whom I have spoken to—they will sometimes spend more time travelling than at work. That simply does not work.

I think that Jim Fairlie rightly mentioned the move to digital contact centres. I have experience of that. When the company that provided my electricity and gas at home closed down, I was switched to another provider—not OVO—and now I am on a tariff that means that I cannot speak to anyone. If I want to find out anything, it is impossible; I cannot speak to someone on the phone—I have to go through an app or a website. It is utterly ludicrous. I consider myself to be someone who is able to deal with most things, but I want to speak to somebody. Elderly customers who are perhaps not as tech savvy as I am will not be able to do that.