The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2352 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
In the bill, “attendance” means coming in.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I think that you would need to give somebody an opportunity to state their case.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It is very important. I just would not be comfortable with setting a figure—and certainly not 10 per cent.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
My approach to stage 2 is that I am open to any suggestions on any part of the bill if they would improve the bill and if it can be demonstrated that they would work. I go back to the phrase “fair and proportionate”, which I have used several times—any proposed system should be fair and proportionate. The process needs to be fair to every member of the Parliament. I do not think that it would be fair to remove somebody without their having had the opportunity to state their case; the fact that they had simply met a trigger would not be good enough. If we were to have that in a regional context, we ought to have it in a constituency context, too.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Are you talking about recall or non-attendance?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
No, I do not see that coming into play. I cannot see religion being relevant, really.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
My thoughts are that, if we accept that there is a two-step process for constituency members—we might not—then we should be consistent and have a similar process for regional members. If we were to change to a one-step process for regional members—in which case we would not have the 10 per cent threshold; we would just do away with that—we would have only one vote on whether that person should stay or go. If we did that, however, why would we not have a one-step process for a constituency member and go straight to a by-election?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I accept that. The question is fair, but it throws up other questions. All that I am saying is that to go down that route throws up other questions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I think that it is enough that somebody is incarcerated.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I think that somebody would have to be in jail.