Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 25 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2352 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Graham Simpson

In the bill, “attendance” means coming in.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Graham Simpson

I think that you would need to give somebody an opportunity to state their case.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Graham Simpson

It is very important. I just would not be comfortable with setting a figure—and certainly not 10 per cent.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Graham Simpson

My approach to stage 2 is that I am open to any suggestions on any part of the bill if they would improve the bill and if it can be demonstrated that they would work. I go back to the phrase “fair and proportionate”, which I have used several times—any proposed system should be fair and proportionate. The process needs to be fair to every member of the Parliament. I do not think that it would be fair to remove somebody without their having had the opportunity to state their case; the fact that they had simply met a trigger would not be good enough. If we were to have that in a regional context, we ought to have it in a constituency context, too.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Graham Simpson

Are you talking about recall or non-attendance?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Graham Simpson

No, I do not see that coming into play. I cannot see religion being relevant, really.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Graham Simpson

My thoughts are that, if we accept that there is a two-step process for constituency members—we might not—then we should be consistent and have a similar process for regional members. If we were to change to a one-step process for regional members—in which case we would not have the 10 per cent threshold; we would just do away with that—we would have only one vote on whether that person should stay or go. If we did that, however, why would we not have a one-step process for a constituency member and go straight to a by-election?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Graham Simpson

I accept that. The question is fair, but it throws up other questions. All that I am saying is that to go down that route throws up other questions.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Graham Simpson

I think that it is enough that somebody is incarcerated.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Graham Simpson

I think that somebody would have to be in jail.