The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2216 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. That would be useful.
A letter was published yesterday by the public policy institute, Enlighten. It was written by 13 senior medical professionals and executives in Scotland. It was an open letter, published in the press and, I think, on Enlighten’s website. Top people have signed up to it. It says:
“We recognise that many people are well served by the NHS in Scotland, and that thousands of dedicated and hard-working people ensure that compassionate and effective, sometimes lifesaving, care is provided on a day-to-day basis. And yet, as has also been acknowledged, the current system of delivering health care and social care in Scotland is unsustainable, often stretched beyond capacity, overly complicated, difficult to navigate, often inefficient and is perceived as not always meeting the needs of people living in Scotland.”
There is a lot more to the letter, but it says—and this is where it relates to your report—that the NHS is “overly complicated”. The letter is potentially touching on governance, which is what your report is about. Could you explain why you think that governance is so important and why changing the governance and simplifying it will make a difference to the people who use the NHS in Scotland?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Thanks, chair. Have you finished your questions, chair?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Graham Simpson
That makes the point. You have five boards that have marked themselves down, and maybe they deserve to be marked down—I do not know—but having someone external to make sure that they are not being too hard on themselves would be useful. I will leave it there, convener, thank you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
So, we have a project director who is an employee of the college and has been able to sign off payments to the company of which she is the director—stop me if I am getting any of this wrong, by the way. That seems to me a situation that is entirely wrong. Would you agree with that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Yes, please.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
So the individual knew the former chair. Do you know what the nature of that relationship was?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
They just knew each other.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
You said that you struggled to get straight answers—or clear answers. Was “Why did you appoint that individual?” one of the questions that you asked?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I think that that is correct, convener.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. None of this should have happened, so are there questions to be asked of the Scottish Funding Council? It does not seem to have had its eye on the ball. If it had, this would possibly not have happened in the first place. Are there lessons for other colleges to learn to prevent this kind of thing from happening in the future?