The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2022 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I want to clear something up, if I can. Paradigm Futures, which has one director, was given work that was not advertised and for which there was no competition. Has anyone explained why the work went to Paradigm Futures rather than someone else?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It is quite key, is it not? Paradigm Futures is basically one person. Was there any evidence that that individual—we have not named anyone today and I will not—knew people at the college before the job was awarded?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
What event was that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Right. Okay.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It is for accuracy.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
As you have said, colleges might increasingly go down the route of setting up such bodies, so rules or strong guidance need to be in place. I would have thought—and you can comment on this—that the Scottish Funding Council should be heavily involved in that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
So, £76,000—that is not an insignificant sum.
In one of the main points of your report, you highlight a “procurement breach” and
“failure by the college to obtain approval to appoint a supplier without competition.”
From whom should that approval have been sought?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Graham Simpson
You have mentioned that you have had to speak to a number of people to get approval for your section 22 report. Was the Scottish Funding Council involved in that? I assume that you have spoken to the council about it.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Graham Simpson
It is a radical idea, convener. The answer is no, I had not considered it. If I was to think it through, I think that it would open up a hornet’s nest that we might not want to open. I imagine that the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities would have a pretty strong view were we to request a power of recall for councillors. I do not think that such a power exists anywhere in the UK.
If you were to suggest a stage 2 amendment along those lines, convener, I would probably resist it. [Interruption.] Convener, you seem to have sparked something off in the committee.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Good.