The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2405 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
I have to say that I do not think that that is good enough if you are coming before the Public Audit Committee and you know that you are going to be asked that question. The Auditor General tends not to produce—and he has not produced—a long list of recommendations. They are pretty straightforward, and you have come here without an answer to that basic question.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Correct me if I am wrong but, Ms Fogarty, I think that you gave a figure earlier that just under half of the people who apply for the adult disability payment get it. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Over half of the people who apply do not get it. Why are they not getting it? Have you done any analysis of that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Colleges Scotland sets out a range of scenarios for the budget, one of which is flat cash, which it calls a “Decline” scenario. It then goes on to set out “Diminished”, “Survivable” and “Sustainable” scenarios.
If you look at the “Decline” scenario, which is flat cash, according to Colleges Scotland, 11 colleges would be at risk of running out of money and would not be able to cover operational costs. Those 11 colleges employ around 6,500 staff. There is a fear that some colleges could close in that scenario.
In your briefing, you mentioned that two colleges were bailed out—they were given extra money by the Government and will presumably have to pay it back. In previous evidence sessions, we were made aware of the Scottish Funding Council risk register, which highlighted that some colleges were at risk. Can you see a scenario in which colleges could close?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
I am not asking about the UK system; I am asking why more than half of the people who apply for ADP do not get it. Is it because they have applied in good faith and have just got things wrong or are there some who have not applied in good faith and are chancing their arm, if I can put it that way?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
I shall move on. Miriam, the convener always asks the same question at the start of such meetings, so you should have known that he was going to ask at the start of this meeting whether you accept the recommendations. Your answer appeared to be, “We have not considered them yet. We will get around to it”. However, the report was published in September, you knew that you were coming here and I would have thought that you would have had an answer to that very simple question. Why did you not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay—you recognise them.
I am going to ask you about one of the key messages in the report that leads to a recommendation. Then I am going to put the recommendation to you to see whether you agree with it. It is about the funding gap, which we have already mentioned. The report highlights the funding gap, with spending exceeding what we get in block grant by £141 million in 2023-24—Mr Stevens confirmed that. It is forecast to reach £770 million by 2029-30. Implementation costs have so far exceeded initial estimates. Despite that, the Government has not set out a clear strategy to manage the gap or ensure long-term sustainability. How are you going to manage that gap? You said earlier—repeatedly—that ADP is fully funded.
Public Audit Committee [Draft}
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay.
Public Audit Committee [Draft}
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Graham Simpson
They have to know what it is that they are meant to be doing. Is the issue that the bodies do not actually know what they are meant to be doing to deliver on the commitment?
Public Audit Committee [Draft}
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Graham Simpson
Thank you. It is back to you, convener.